Re: U.N. Security Council Authorizes No-Fly Zone in Libya
Posted: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:20:04
I love watching the left eat their own

Freedom Isn't Free - Buy a Gun.
https://vagunforum.net:443/phpbb/
US jet crashes in Libya, both crew are safe
Chasbo00 wrote:Have the French surrendered yet?
Yea, I heard the French have a new tank that they want to try out too when they go after the oil fields. The tank is really speedy with five gears - 4 reverse and 1 forward. The forward gear is in case they are attacked from the rear.OakRidgeStars wrote:Chasbo00 wrote:Have the French surrendered yet?![]()
I doubt that they will give up that easy this time. They are very dependent on Libyan oil.
Has anyone heard which F-15 model it was from a reliable source? $30M is an old number (1998) for an older variant. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/F-15totes6 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110322/ap_ ... bya_us_jet
US jet crashes in Libya, both crew are safe
I am just grateful that both the pilot and weapon system officer are ok and back in friendly hands. Just sad that we are down another 30 million from the loss of the F-15.
Ya, that's what it seems. Even still, $30M is what a new one cost in 1998 and every couple of years we upgrade the electronics in those so I wouldn't be surprised to see that number double.grumpyMSG wrote:According to reports and the fact that it had a 2 man crew, it is pretty safe to believe it was an F-15E Strike Eagle.
When asked what his new strategy will be to support the UN in its goals, Obama replied that he would be inviting Qaddafi for lunch and then proceed to hit the controversial leader in the arm repeatedly while asking, "Which hurts worse? A? or B?"Obama said the United States will be pulling back this week from its dominant role in the international campaign aimed at preventing Qaddafi from attacking civilians. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the U.S. could turn over control of the operation as soon as Saturday.
They'll have to update it..OakRidgeStars wrote:No boots on the ground, you say?. We'll see.
Here come the Marines.
http://www.wcti12.com/news/27257042/detail.html
No argument on that logic. They are the most versatile bird in the USAF inventory though, capable of the attack mission and air superiority if necessary. I wonder how many of them you could buy for the cost of one F22 or F35, it would take more crewmembers, but 20 Strike Eagles versus 4 Raptors wouldn't be a very fair fight in my eyes.gunderwood wrote:Ya, that's what it seems. Even still, $30M is what a new one cost in 1998 and every couple of years we upgrade the electronics in those so I wouldn't be surprised to see that number double.grumpyMSG wrote:According to reports and the fact that it had a 2 man crew, it is pretty safe to believe it was an F-15E Strike Eagle.
Your right, if you believe the war games and simulations the F-15s would get their butts handed to them before they even knew there was an enemy out there. One of the first exercises saw the F-22 put up 144:0 ratio against the best of the rest. A later exercise (can't find a link right now) where F-15s were outfitted with ASEA radars the kill ratio dropped to something like 20-30:1. I don't recall if those were Es or SE prototypes.grumpyMSG wrote:No argument on that logic. They are the most versatile bird in the USAF inventory though, capable of the attack mission and air superiority if necessary. I wonder how many of them you could buy for the cost of one F22 or F35, it would take more crewmembers, but 20 Strike Eagles versus 4 Raptors wouldn't be a very fair fight in my eyes.gunderwood wrote:Ya, that's what it seems. Even still, $30M is what a new one cost in 1998 and every couple of years we upgrade the electronics in those so I wouldn't be surprised to see that number double.grumpyMSG wrote:According to reports and the fact that it had a 2 man crew, it is pretty safe to believe it was an F-15E Strike Eagle.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()