NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
User avatar
zephyp
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 10207
Joined: Tue, 05 May 2009 08:40:55
Location: Springfield, VA

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by zephyp »

Just noticed. I hate to correct grammar on a site like this and not that I agree with the premise but shouldnt it be "Hooters are inappropriate" not "Hooters is..."
No more catchy slogans for me...I am simply fed up...4...four...4...2+2...

Image
User avatar
wylde007
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1047
Joined: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:44:35
Location: Virginia Beach, Occupied VA, CSA
Contact:

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by wylde007 »

No. Because a "Hooters Restaurant" is a singular entity. If we are talking about multiple restaurant locations as a collective entity (ie: "Hooters") then we can consider them to still be in the singular and thus "Hooters IS inappropriate".

However, if the title were to be expanded to indicate that the Hooters franchises were being considered in the plural as a group and not an entity unto themselves you would say "Hooters RESTAURANTS ARE inappropriate."

Further, in regard to the alluded feminine anatomical reference, "hooters" would be plural and could be noted as "hooters are inappropriate" however it would be unusual to see any singular use of the term "hooter" unless you were referring to a woman breastfeeding or Rob Hyman.
The quiet war has begun, with silent weapons
And the newest slavery is to keep the people poor, and stupid.
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Image
User avatar
zephyp
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 10207
Joined: Tue, 05 May 2009 08:40:55
Location: Springfield, VA

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by zephyp »

wylde007 wrote:No. Because a "Hooters Restaurant" is a singular entity. If we are talking about multiple restaurant locations as a collective entity (ie: "Hooters") then we can consider them to still be in the singular and thus "Hooters IS inappropriate".

However, if the title were to be expanded to indicate that the Hooters franchises were being considered in the plural as a group and not an entity unto themselves you would say "Hooters RESTAURANTS ARE inappropriate."

Further, in regard to the alluded feminine anatomical reference, "hooters" would be plural and could be noted as "hooters are inappropriate" however it would be unusual to see any singular use of the term "hooter" unless you were referring to a woman breastfeeding or Rob Hyman.
Thank you Mr Braniac for that wonderful diatribe...ruin my fun will ya... :roll:
No more catchy slogans for me...I am simply fed up...4...four...4...2+2...

Image
User avatar
wylde007
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1047
Joined: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:44:35
Location: Virginia Beach, Occupied VA, CSA
Contact:

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by wylde007 »

That's what I'm here for: fun ruinin'.

:clap:
The quiet war has begun, with silent weapons
And the newest slavery is to keep the people poor, and stupid.
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Image
User avatar
zephyp
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 10207
Joined: Tue, 05 May 2009 08:40:55
Location: Springfield, VA

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by zephyp »

wylde007 wrote:That's what I'm here for: fun ruinin'.

:clap:
Well, tis the season to have fun so you'll be busier than Santa... :whistle:
No more catchy slogans for me...I am simply fed up...4...four...4...2+2...

Image
OakRidgeStars
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 14108
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by OakRidgeStars »

speaking of hooters.... :whistle:
Image
User avatar
Tweaker
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 995
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:00:37
Location: Left Charlibsville, VA for SC, near CLT, NC

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by Tweaker »

I have only been to a Hooters two or three times because the wings are easily worse than those served at cafeterias of bought in bulk at Sam's Club. To make matters worse, nearly every waitress was flat chested! I found much more to my liking in the posterior displays. Me likey hot pantses!

Near total dissapoint!
Officially outed waissists: Taggure, Allingeneral, Tweaker, VBShooter, Snaz, Jim, OakRidgeStars, Wylde, clayinva, Komrade Kreutz, scrubber3, Mindflaya'. All the kewl kids are waississ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTsW75KJ ... re=related
User avatar
Yarddawg
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:14:28

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by Yarddawg »

We had a Quaker Steak & Lube open near us this year. The wings are waaaaaaaayyyyyy better than hooters, and the waitresses are easy on the eyes too!
Engage your brain!
User avatar
fireman836
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:10:56
Location: Accomac

Re: NOW says Hooters is inappropriate for kids

Post by fireman836 »

Food not that good, Way to loud Cna make my own wings at home. Girls are ok.
Yes I carry a Bible and a Gun, your point.

Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos (meaning: "A defence of liberty against tyrants")
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”