Page 2 of 2
Re: VPC still uneffectively trying to debate
Posted: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 06:40:48
by zephyp
VBshooter wrote:OK, I guess we can do without the noose, I got dibs on bringing the feathers !!
The point I was trying make is if bringing tar/feathers is to be truly effective you have to use them...
Re: VPC still uneffectively trying to debate
Posted: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:16:11
by VBshooter
Absolutley ,,so was I! I figured adding a noose for effect would add a bit of theatrics for the media to raise hell about along with the Tar and Feather body suits.
Re: VPC still uneffectively trying to debate
Posted: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:28:03
by gatorbait
It's been quite a long time since I was a member of the Florida State champion debating team, just a week or so before London went bonkers on VE Day. In the days the National Forensic League required that data used in debates have a factual basis. Given that, it will be a cold day in Hades before the VPC will be allowed to debate. Someone please tell them that their arguments leave no room for facts.
Re: VPC still uneffectively trying to debate
Posted: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:35:28
by gunderwood
gatorbait wrote:It's been quite a long time since I was a member of the Florida State champion debating team, just a week or so before London went bonkers on VE Day. In the days the National Forensic League required that data used in debates have a factual basis. Given that, it will be a cold day in Hades before the VPC will be allowed to debate. Someone please tell them that their arguments leave no room for facts.
