Page 2 of 2

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:59:34
by dorminWS
You say you're wondering what really went on in that airplane?

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:04:36
by MarcSpaz
It was threats or pay to play and the entire planet knows it.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:00:25
by OakRidgeStars
FiremanBob wrote:More likely, with what did they threaten him?
They just asked him if he liked sunrises, and if he wanted to see another one.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 16:52:28
by Ironbear
FiremanBob wrote:More likely, with what did they threaten him?
Nobody likes the idea of turning their career into a smoking crater...

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:04:18
by kelu
Well, Comey guy kept the guy I read daily (Martin Armstrong) for 2 years in jail without a charge.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/inte ... ndictment/
I did not believed this is possible in America.

Also, looks like this guy is not doing it for the first time:
http://time.com/4276988/jim-comey-hillary-clinton/

And some of you criticized me when I expressed disappointment after more than 80 cases when FBI officers have been involved in dubious shootings were always found not guilty. It was the case when a friend of a Boston Bomber was shot in the back of the head, unarmed and if I recall handcuffed.

It's time for a deep cleanup of the administration, at all levels. Or it will be war, sooner or later.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:40:30
by mamabearCali
Well the FBI just became another corrupt political alphabet agency that needs scrubbing possibly dissolution.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:16:00
by Reverenddel
Correct. At this point?

"We the People" has been changed to "We the Serfs".

It will take a mass enforce of violence against peaceful citizens to start the uprising. I would love to think the Federal Guv'mint in all it's wisdom will NOT be so stupid at to "press that button"...

...however I ain't so damned sure anymore. They feel invincible.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:31:05
by Swampman
The government will not, directly, start the revolution. Indirectly, through fiscal mismanagement and a general economic collapse caused by the former, they will start the revolution.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:20:33
by jdonovan
hey Kelu, at least in a communist country you KNEW the government was corrupt.

Here we mistakenly thought it wasn't.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 05:30:50
by kelu
jdonnovan: correct as always.
The problem now that we know: what we will do about it?

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 06:02:45
by jdonovan
That is the major question.

I think people long ago lost the belief that at the national level you could elect a person who supported your views. At the local level at least, it still feels a bit like you've got some influence. During the last town/county elections some of the decisions came down to 20 or less votes. That makes it seem like there is a chance that you can make a difference by participating.

The last few years have show the courts are heavily slanted to the establishment, and things the 'ordinary man' would have been easily convicted for doing, the ruling class member doesn't even get charged. That just reinforces the feelings of inequality, and with no ability to seek remedies through an election, or the justice system the general public is left with very few good options to use.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:02:50
by kelu
From my summary understanding of the justice system, I think bringing back the principal role to the grand jury, not judges and attorneys would be a possible solution. Let the peers decide.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:18:52
by Viper21
I never expected her to be convicted BUT.... I absolutely expected her to be indicted. Honestly, it really felt like 20yrs ago when the OJ verdict was read. I was shocked. I thought OJ was the guiltiest man in America. I feel the same way about Hillary.

I don't think you have to go to law school or even close to, read the statutes, look at what she's done (most of which is public), & determine that she's guilty of multiple crimes. This nonsense about "intent"... is just that, nonsense. Intent is not needed for guilt in some of the laws she broke. On top of that, I call BS on her intent. While, her "intent" may not have been to destroy America or to sell secrets, her "intent" was to hide her correspondence from freedom of information request. Her intent was to hide her collaboration/s from prying eyes like news agencies, & the American public. I believed from the beginning she wouldn't be convicted but, really am shocked she isn't going to be charged with anything.

I firmly believe the reasoning is because O is dirty. He knew what she was doing, & there are email chains between the two of em. That's why it's getting buried, & she's walking.... imo. She probably threatened him with the ol.... "if I go down, you're going with me" . The whole thing makes me sick.

Re: FBI - No charges recommended

Posted: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:23:09
by MarcSpaz
It's the biggest political fix in US history. Everyone who delt with her knew she was doing business on a non-DOS email account... including the POTUS and all of the cabinet members. The entire administration is implicated.

The bottom line is, the DNC is 100% out for the DNC. Long live King DNC. No member shall fall from Grace and no "Subjects" shall ever climb to power.