McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
User avatar
dorminWS
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7163
Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
Location: extreme SW VA

Re: McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

Post by dorminWS »

SHMIV wrote:Of all the folks that I have known to fall behind on child support, I'm the only one that can legally possess a gun. (Apparently, when you find out that you are the father of a three year old, you get to pay 3 years of back child support. )

Outside of garnishing wages, I really can't think of anything else that will make a negligent parent pay child support. And, that doesn't work well, either. The negligent parent just quits working when the garnishment starts.

Of course, if they brought back public humiliation. ...

As was previously stated, this has nothing to do with encouraging responsible parenting, anyway. Most folks that aren't paying child support are felons, anyway, (at least, that's been my personal observation) so any permit that gets yanked will be a bonus for that schmuck.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I really do feel strongly that if you father children you should support them. But sometimes there is no small amount of abuse to the detriment of defaulting daddies. What sometimes happens is that mamma leaves and files for welfare (or sometimes that mamma doesn't tell papa there's a bun in the oven) and later there's welfare benefits to reimburse or child support (both current and arrearages) to pay. And sometimes the delinquent daddy knows of the kid and just tries not to pay. At any rate, the amount owed, due if nothing else to the passage of time, usually dwarfs the poor sod's earning capacity; and when the folks at the Division of Child Support Enforcement (who all seem to me to be man-hating militant feminists) send out those Orders to Withhold and Deliver, they commonly leave the poor delinquent daddy with less money per payday than he requires to maintain minimal shelter and feed himself. Last time I checked they were not required to leave the debtor with the greater of 30 times the minimum wage or 1/3 of his disposable income as with a garnishment, and it seems they never do. If you happen to have one who is a good worker and you give him a raise, they raise the amount they take. So the delinquent papa usually quits and goes elsewhere; where he works until the first quarterly withholding reports from the new employer allow the support collectors to find him and take all his money again; at which time he quits and moves yet again. I've actually talked to a few of the militant ladies at the Division of Child Support Enforcement and pointed out that this does not help the mother or the children. On every such occasion, I was told the just plain didn't care about that; their job was to put the screws to the delinquent daddy. I had one of these guys, when I told him that sooner or later some judge was going to throw his butt in jail, that if they did that at least they had to give him a roof and four walls and 3 square meals a day, and that the support order didn't leave him that. Sad, but typical of scheme concocted by the government to "help people" or "dispense social justice".
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
User avatar
ProShooter
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 2176
Joined: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:46:51
Location: Richmond, Va.
Contact:

Re: McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

Post by ProShooter »

I just did an interview with Ch. 12 today about this. Its supposed to air at 4pm.
Image

http://www.ProactiveShooters.com

NRA Certified Instructor
Utah State Certified Instructor
NRA Membership Recruiter
NRA RTBAV Instructor
NRA Chief RSO


"Make your gun go to work, and carry every day!"
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

Post by SHMIV »

Yeah, that's what happened to me. One day... "Surprise! You're a daddy. Have been for 3 years." I was able to work a payment plan, and got that debt wiped out. I didn't mind paying it; I did father the boy, after all. And, it was a welfare thing that I was paying on. What did irritate me, though, was the fact that my boys mother, having spent the bulk of that 3 year period incarcerated, was supposed to pay half of that debt. But, since she didn't, I was obligated to. She spent the rest of her life dodging child support. And nothing was going to make her pay it.

I'm not unsympathetic to folks who find it difficult to pay child support, but, at the same time, it CAN be done, and the arrears paid off.

A few things that help in court; dress appropriately, respect the judge, be humble. And, if possible, bring along respectable and productive friends and family for moral support (and possible character witness).

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
Rumson
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:29:46
Location: Loudoun County

Re: McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

Post by Rumson »

Not sue what you mean SHMIV. Mcaulfie is going after an easy justification due to the bias in custody courts. If the permit holder is already a felon the state can take action based on that felony... Mcaulfie is whipping up bias against alpha males to appease his alpha female and beta females and general limp waisted hipster wanna get laid male supporters.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
mamabearCali
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 2753
Joined: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:08:25

Re: McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

Post by mamabearCali »

I doubt he will get anywhere. Should die in committee.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

Post by MarcSpaz »

I know he's a Lib, but hopefully the committee won't kill him. :whistle:
User avatar
scott9050
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:59:36

Re: McAuliffe to push for package of new gun restrictions

Post by scott9050 »

I am friends with a guy who works in law enforcement. 20 years or so ago while in the Navy in Florida he and his ex wife got into an argument. The neighbors called police, and the cops decided that someone was going to jail under the then new Florida domestic violence law. He volunteered since they had small children that needed looked after. He was duped into signing a statement saying he was guilty of a misdemeanor, paying a small fine and being released immediately. The alternative was to stay in jail until his hearing, not possible for him.
He never laid hands on her which is why he was able to stay in the Navy and retire then become an officer.
Under these changes he would lose all privileges, his job and everything he has to support the 5 children whom still live under his roof with he and his new wife. He would become another notch on a liberal scum bags self promoting agenda to destroy middle class America and the Second amendment.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”