The Code doesnt address percentage, I simply used that as an example to quantify my answer. The Code does however further define "concealed" as "a weapon shall be deemed to be hidden from common observation when it is observable but is of such deceptive appearance as to disguise the weapon's true nature". Now that defintion is generally used for things like sword canes, etc. I have seen some attorneys spin some wonderful arguments, so in my mind anything is possible.zephyp wrote:My apologies, Jim, but I aint buyin it about the IWB. The code states "hidden from common observation." If I'm carrying an IWB and tuck properly my pistol is not hidden from common observation and is clearly visible. If you can show me in the code where it talks about percent visible or other than "hidden from common observation" then I'll be convinced.
You are obviously free to do as you wish, which is the same thing that I tell my students. I only offer my opinion and the opinion of the person (that I asked) who may be prosecuting someone. I asked 2 people, one said he could make a solid argument for concealment, the other said that a concealment charge would be weak as its a grey area.







"Not to worry, I got this !!! " "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker