Page 2 of 2
Re: Court won't hear Cuccinelli sodomy law appeal
Posted: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:07:22
by trailrunner
ratherfish wrote:Sorry but the same "mindless libertarian drones and impotent conservatives" that elected Obummer in Virginia will likely fall for the same line on KC. And elect McAwefull.
The only arguments (sic) I've heard from you is a bunch of insults. Absolutely no substance to anything you say.
Re: Court won't hear Cuccinelli sodomy law appeal
Posted: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:15:07
by ratherfish
As far as the election is concerned..
IF THE SHOE FITS.. WEAR IT!
Had conservatives turned out and conservative folk not bit on the democrap slander feeling somehow more "clean" as a libertarian waisting their votes, we wouldn't have Baraccus Obamus and his band of creepy progressive lickspittle candidates....
You ever heard the saying; Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice shame on me?
This is the second round and the stakes are your State and your guns...
How important are they?
I'd love to be proved wrong but that seems to not be the case given the comments here.
The issue is a red herring planted to manipulate you.
Ken won't show up in your bedroom but whoopie might.....at least in nightmares....lol
Re: Court won't hear Cuccinelli sodomy law appeal
Posted: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:14:51
by SpanishInquisition
ratherfish wrote:.
The issue is a red herring planted to manipulate you.
This is your most interesting proclamation yet. Please do tell us about how the demonazis time travelled to 2004 and influenced Cuccinelli's vote to plant this "red hering".
Wait a minute before you start, I need to get the popcorn outta the microwave.
Re: Court won't hear Cuccinelli sodomy law appeal
Posted: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:00:19
by ratherfish
Let me know when KC appears in your bedroom.
Till then sir you're used.