Re: Why Romney Lost
Posted: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:57:59
Please don't feed the troll.
Freedom Isn't Free - Buy a Gun.
https://vagunforum.net:443/phpbb/
Kreutz wrote:There is a cause and effect relationship between Obamas skin color and his massive support amongst non-whites. Is that no less racist?FiremanBob wrote:Hairtrigger, while I suspect that lukertin is an Obamunist plant send here to disrupt VGOF, I will agree with his latest post in this thread. Your post is an ugly, racist comment that must be called out as wrong on VGOF or any other forum. I hope it does not reflect your actual opinion on the topic of liberty and justice for all.
And illegal immigrants are being "pandered" to, previously just by the Dems, but now by the Republicans. This will have a negative effect on the nation.
Damn, I had a hunch I sunk the chance of waking up to President Goode, this only confirmed it.CowboyT wrote:Wow....
These two posts exemplify why your candidate lost.
Maybe. Obama did better amongst old folks than people think, even crochecty old white men. Obama promised to keep the SS and medicare flowing....neither of which is sustainable incidentally.WAustin wrote:Following you logic is there a cause and effect relationship with the white support for Mitt Romney? More specifically older white males?
The Dems stopped being for white Americans in the mid 60's, way before my time. Its likely blacks would have been very much inclined to vote Republican then.Historically when dems nominated white candidates did blacks still vote approx the same percentile?
Yes they have for at least the last 20 years, though I know TX and FL are exceptions.Historically did Hispanics vote more dem then republician?
A quick Google search showed Romney pulled 27% of Latinos, so the 13% difference would at least imply pandering pays off.Bush who as you would call it pandered to illegals still only get 40 percent of the Hispanic vote?