Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

dorminWS wrote:

Roverhound wrote:Now you're being funny. Romney is not a conservative.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

No, you're being UNfunny. Compared to Obama, Teddy freakin' Kennedy was a conservative!

Look at his voting record. Ever hear of Romneycare? How about his stance on gun control. Roll over Romney! Good boy!

My DH and I like to watch our West Wing series. When it first came out we were irritated by how very leftist it was, now we are amused at how centered and semi-rational it seems to those occupying that office at this moment.

Romney is not fully conservative, but he is a heck of a lot better than the president we currently have.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

dorminWS wrote:

Roverhound wrote:Now you're being funny. Romney is not a conservative.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

No, you're being UNfunny. Compared to Obama, Teddy freakin' Kennedy was a conservative!

Maybe during the primary, but now its a general election so Mitt can shake that etch a sketch and show his true colors.

I don't think "voters will swallow" the swill in the Baracus Obamus speacification of defeat from last night.

Anyone who is paying attention knows he snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq, was unable to negotiate a status of forces agreement. He "surged" troops into Afganistan in shackles of progressive rules of engagement only to lay claim to a full 60% of our casualties there. What's more he committed the sin of informing an enemy of a departure date, only it seems to return to the Bush strategy for Afganistan.

Only anarchists, progressives, and Ron Paul supporters can't tell the difference!

The rest of us aren't stupid.

Must. Vote. Who. Fox. Tells. Me. Too.
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

Funny.....

Except all I hear from you are lamestream media talking points.....

I DON'T believe the democrat controlled lamestream media....PERIOD.
I DON'T believe the liar in chief.
I BELIEVE what I can prove. Regardless of the source.

"Only anarchists, progressives, and Ron Paul supporters can't tell the difference!

The rest of us aren't stupid."

ratherfish wrote:Funny.....

Except all I hear from you are lamestream media talking points.....

Really? Like what?
If all of you are so smart why don't you go check his voting record?

Roverhound wrote:

ratherfish wrote:Funny.....

Except all I hear from you are lamestream media talking points.....

Really? Like what?
If all of you are so smart why don't you go check his voting record?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Tell you what. Accoding to you, there's no differnce between Obama and Romney. That means it is hopeless and all is lost. I'll loan you a bullet any time you get ready, ole buddy.

Sure let me check out obummers voting record........hmmmmm.....as a state senator he voted to deny medical care to viable babies born alive during an abortion, he has never said he would not do so again and called inconvenient babies a punishment---- X ----( strike one in my book). As a senator he voted present most of the time, if you are there to represent your state you really need to get abreast of the issues and vote---- X -----(strike two). As president he signed the incredible nightmare of Obamacare into law, which amoung other things forces people to participate in commerce by force of law simply for being alive and forces churches to pay for things they see as sin. X That is a BIG strike three.

Romney is not perfect and if I had a better choice I would not go his way, but what is, is. He will likely right many things that are horrendous right now, and where his liberal tendencies are he will do less damage.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Please, not supporting Romney doesn't mean I am for the joke we have in office now. We had better candidates but we threw them away, or should I say the media and lack of voter attention did.
Too many people vote blindly, that's how we get people like Obama and Romney in office.
And yes, I am a Ron Paul supporter. It's a shame Fox news didn't like him or we may have a real option on the block.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... many-slots
you are allowed to vote only if you vote with who we want.
"If voting would change anything, it would be made illegal".
Oh man...

Roverhound wrote:Please, not supporting Romney doesn't mean I am for the joke we have in office now. We had better candidates but we threw them away, or should I say the media and lack of voter attention did.
Too many people vote blindly, that's how we get people like Obama and Romney in office.
And yes, I am a Ron Paul supporter. It's a shame Fox news didn't like him or we may have a real option on the block.

So you'll bad mouth Romney and elect B HO?

I'd say that's voting pretty "blindly"

kelu wrote:http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... many-slots
you are allowed to vote only if you vote with who we want.
"If voting would change anything, it would be made illegal".
Oh man...

You misrepresent the article. They simply ask the deligates to vote as the VOTERS DID in the primary on the first ballot at the convention! After that they're free to be gerrymandered by Paul. IN SPITE of what primary voters said with their votes!

Shades of Al Gore if you're willing to change the established rules only to elect your candidate!

"They're all the same" is strait Ron Paul propoganda. Now who's being told what to think?

Is this a preventive punish of those Ron Paul delegates, before they do anything? I don't understand many things, being here only since last year. The simple fact that here something which in other parts of the world is called bribe and corruption here is legal and is called lobby is already hard to swallow. But what I see here is a supposed thought crime punishment. Or maybe I just don't understand and in this case please explain me this game. Please understand, I was born in communism and I saw too many rigged elections.

kelu wrote:Is this a preventive punish of those Ron Paul delegates, before they do anything? I don't understand many things, being here only since last year. The simple fact that here something which in other parts of the world is called bribe and corruption here is legal and is called lobby is already hard to swallow. But what I see here is a supposed thought crime punishment. Or maybe I just don't understand and in this case please explain me this game. Please understand, I was born in communism and I saw too many rigged elections.

"The RNC is concerned that the Paul campaign will game the state-level convention this weekend that selects delegates to the national convention. While Mitt Romney should be awarded 20 of the state's 28 delegates"

The rules say they have to dance with the man that brought them on the first vote!

Would you wipe out the votes cast in the states primary election?

Okay....

in the weeds.....

Someones not following along.

ratherfish wrote:

Roverhound wrote:Please, not supporting Romney doesn't mean I am for the joke we have in office now. We had better candidates but we threw them away, or should I say the media and lack of voter attention did.
Too many people vote blindly, that's how we get people like Obama and Romney in office.
And yes, I am a Ron Paul supporter. It's a shame Fox news didn't like him or we may have a real option on the block.

So you'll bad mouth Romney and elect B HO?

I'd say that's voting pretty "blindly"

Where did I ever say I was voting for Obama?

So you just apologize for him?

ratherfish wrote:So you just apologize for him?

Facts are facts. Paul is not going to be the candidate. If he runs 3rd party he will elect Obama.

You either support Romney and hold his feet to the fire or you elect Obama. Ron Paul is unectable.

ratherfish wrote:So you just apologize for him?

Ummm, what? Where have I supported Obama. Or apoligized for him?
What I have said is Romney and Obama are different sides of the same coin.
You are really struggling to put the words in my mouth aren't you?