Page 2 of 2
Re: contraception deception
Posted: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:03:06
by tursiops
I don't think they are the same person. Unless ratherfish is seriously schizo. Oh, wait...ummm, maybe.

Re: contraception deception
Posted: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:51:16
by TheGodfather
tursiops wrote:
Obamacare hasn't even started yet, so how can the costs go down?
Exactly who do you get your information from???
I'm an insurance broker and to hear someone claim that Obamacare hasn't started yet is laughably absurd! Even more laughable is to believe that it's purpose is to drive down costs!
Here's a timeline to help you see the truth:
http://healthreform.kff.org/timeline.aspx
Re: contraception deception
Posted: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:03:27
by tursiops
TheGodfather wrote:tursiops wrote:
Obamacare hasn't even started yet, so how can the costs go down?
Exactly who do you get your information from???
I'm an insurance broker and to hear someone claim that Obamacare hasn't started yet is laughably absurd! Even more laughable is to believe that it's purpose is to drive down costs!
Here's a timeline to help you see the truth:
http://healthreform.kff.org/timeline.aspx
I'm sorry, you are right, of course. I was referring to the individual mandates and the guaranteed coverage provisions, which is what I mostly hear people unhappy about when they mention Obamacare.
Re: contraception deception
Posted: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:17:07
by TheGodfather
tursiops wrote:TheGodfather wrote:tursiops wrote:
Obamacare hasn't even started yet, so how can the costs go down?
Exactly who do you get your information from???
I'm an insurance broker and to hear someone claim that Obamacare hasn't started yet is laughably absurd! Even more laughable is to believe that it's purpose is to drive down costs!
Here's a timeline to help you see the truth:
http://healthreform.kff.org/timeline.aspx
I'm sorry, you are right, of course. I was referring to the individual mandates and the guaranteed coverage provisions, which is what I mostly hear people unhappy about when they mention Obamacare.
So you think individual mandates and the guaranteed coverage provisions will drive down costs???
Speaking of being receptive to nonsense...

Re: contraception deception
Posted: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:47:19
by ratherfish
Typical liberal response to "contraception deception"...change the subject and attack.

Re: contraception deception
Posted: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:15:32
by ratherfish
Maybe i'm theGodfather........lol
ah...no....I just agree with him!

Re: contraception deception
Posted: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:07:19
by ratherfish
Connecting the Dots: O’Reilly Traces Sandra Fluke to Former White House Adviser
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/connect ... e-adviser/
All to draw attention away from forcing religious orginizations to provide FREE contraception, stearilizations, and abortion pills.
They set up the straw man and went after religious institutions!
This should outrage all Americans!
Re: contraception deception
Posted: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:37:43
by joeshmo
Kreutz wrote:mk4 wrote:wait... what?? joe and the fish are the same person??
Same syntax, same obsession with me, registered the same time roughly, frequent the same threads....
Just a hunch.
Wouldn't shock me if they had the same IP or one was using a ghetto proxy like Anonymouse

You are a genius!!! I'm caught!! BTW notice there was a huge amount of new registered users when vagt went down. Don't flatter yourself with your alligations of obsession. You just make some wild claims and dont back up any of it. For the sake of this site you should be banned.
Re: contraception deception
Posted: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:01:30
by joeshmo
One more thing krud- I noticed you called me ratherfish's sock puppet. Call everyone a sock puppet when they disagree with you? Due to your narcissistic ways you just cant fathom to see that you are wrong ever (but most of the time you are). Never even went onto this topic and YOU brought me into it. Can't belive I did not catch this topic before..... lol

Re: contraception deception
Posted: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:03:48
by OakRidgeStars
Looks like this thread has gone about as far as it can. Time to wrap it up.