FFL Transfer Fee for Retail Unethical?

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
User avatar
JustinCase
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:37:26

Re: FFL Transfer Fee for Retail Unethical?

Post by JustinCase »

Ive never ever paid a transfer fee when buying a gun from a LGS. The transfer fee is from one FFL to another, not from the primary FFL to the consumer....

I would steer clear of these unethical prix.

JC
User avatar
bikiboki
Marksman
Marksman
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:06:05
Location: Montana

Re: FFL Transfer Fee for Retail Unethical?

Post by bikiboki »

I've purchased most of my firearms from "brick & mortar" retail shops...never paid a FFL Transfer Fee for a firearm over the counter retail in-stock purchase...and that back ground check fee (as another poster mentioned) $2.00. I don't dicker when faced with a MSRP price tag (they have to make a living & there's a fair margin in that price for the retailer), but neither will I pay 1 penny over MSRP.

Bill
There are only three types of mistakes: Those you suffer from; those you learn from; and those you don't survive.
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: FFL Transfer Fee for Retail Unethical?

Post by jdonovan »

gungeek wrote:I've never run across this before in my entire life. Does anyone feel that this is just plain unethical or am I missing something?
Unethical?

Hardly. But this is how a free market works. If you don't like the retailers policies, then you spend your money elsewhere. Perhaps the retailer figures out why the customers are going away, perhaps not. If they fix the problems then they can succeed, if not then they can't stay in the market.
Locked

Return to “General Discussion”