You limited attention span and reading comprehension is not my problem. Expressing a complete idea takes time, particularly when you have address the other sides points for them because of their inability to do so.Kreutz wrote:Verbal (textual?) diarrhea an argument is not. You take fifteen words to say what most people can say in three. Simply boring me is not a challenge, its a win by default because I DONT HAVE THE TIME TO READ PAGES OF TEXT, at best I skim them, usually I scroll past them.
Hey, it was your argument not mine. I simply provided a counter example for your absurd claims about Abrams tanks and nukes. If you don't want to discuss it I suggest you don't post it.Kreutz wrote:yes yes, break a tank with a stick (or whatever, I'm not clicking the link because I don't care).
Already covered, but you don't bother to read. I made no such claims.Kreutz wrote:AGAIN, for the at least FIFTH time, what makes you think these future guerrilla fighters are going to DO it, without keeling over from an occluded coronary artery whilst running up to it?
I didn't make that up...that's conventional wisdom from the people who do that for a living. I could go on and provide you details/sources, but apparently anything over 160 characters you can't comprehend.Kreutz wrote:Yeah, that's the new normal btw. And you're prattling on about "tactical advantages in an urban environment"...are you delusional?
Interesting you harp on lazy people when you can't be bothered to read.Kreutz wrote:The fat lazy weak-willed countrymen you keep ascribing these magical nonexistant powers of resistance to is mind-boggling in its persistence. Given your intellect I can only ascribe this falalcy to some kind of fervent hope.
Those certainly aren't most people I know. Interestingly enough, most of the people I know are very resourceful and self-reliant. I can see how that would be your default view of America given that you tend to hang out with people who can't conceive of anything that isn't given to them by the government or run by it.
Again, already addressed, but you don't bother to read. If you can't respond to a counter argument, just repeating yours doesn't mean anything.Kreutz wrote:YES I know few participated in the Revolutionary War; again, DIFFERENT time, DIFFERENT people, DIFFERENT war. Todays fractured Balkanized sacs of redundant protoplasm cannot (literally due to language barriers) and will not unite, for anything other than self-interest.
Big difference in wind powered ships leaving England and taking weeks to get here with 18th century technology versus plentiful CONUS bases and modern technology.
I don't have any fantasies about overthrowing the government, nor do I propose it. If you bothered to read you would already know that, but that seems to be a common deficiency...Kreutz wrote:Drop your fantasies of overthrowing the government, and do what I did. Read Ride the Tiger by Julius Evola; it tells you everything you need to survive what may or may not come.






