Page 7 of 9

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:07:21
by mamabearCali
Smart girls!

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 07:37:47
by Swampman
Maybe that's where SWMBO originated!

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:10:01
by vaeevictiss
VACoastie wrote:Well well well. Cracker Barrel has reversed its decision on pulling merchandise from the shelves. I will say that last night when I went there was NO Duck Dynasty stuff out, only Duck Commander.

It appears they collapsed to the social media aspect and the many calls and complaints of customers of their decision to remove select merchandise.

Soooo, they are for equal treatment and blah blah as long as it doesn't affect business and a few people complain?

Sure sounds like how America works too. A few complain, all will win/lose to appease and make them look like the good guy.

Do us a favor, if you say something, stick by it. Now I wish I didn't give them 40 dollars of my money.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Um... that was the point. Unless you typed that wrong that was the intent. They removed the duck dynasty stuff (ie A&E) and kept the duck commander stuff (ie The Robertsons).

So they stood by their word and supported the family and not the channel that exiled them.

Again, unless you typed that backwards.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:16:44
by VACoastie
No I didn't. Duck Dynasty is owned by A&E. The ones that shunned Phil. Duck Commader is owned by the Robertsons. They kept DC stuff which is why I went to go eat at the establishment. But by them falling on their word to keep A&E products I'm irritated.

I could care less about the DD brand, the Robertsons we're doing fine even before that. I'm irritated at the fact that Cracker Barrel did not stand behind their word because of a little public scrutiny (unlike Phil who's not apologizing for what he said/thinks). Think back to chik-fil-a. They stood behind their words and didn't back down.

Cracker Barrel, just like the rest of America, bows down to appease a select few instead of sticking by their words.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:56:20
by Kreutz
SpanishInquisition wrote:Fun fact. James I of England (aka James VI of Scotland) had several of the scholars / translators that disagreed with him imprisoned or put to death.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Funner fact: King James had a strong preference for the uh, London Tower.

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:22:18
by Reverenddel
Stronger fun fact, there were 5 horsemen of the apocalypse, and one was removed because it offended people...

The fifth? Perversion.

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:41:30
by allingeneral
Duck Dynasty marathon on A&E - something's a little fishy here. So offended - yet - here's a marathon - please visit our sponsors.

http://twitchy.com/2013/12/23/photo-sho ... k-dynasty/

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:45:30
by FiremanBob
Reverenddel wrote:Stronger fun fact, there were 5 horsemen of the apocalypse, and one was removed because it offended people...

The fifth? Perversion.
Did you just make that up?

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:14:19
by dorminWS
Phil Robertson tells all the dirt on himself.

http://minutemennews.com/2013/12/phil-r ... k-dynasty/

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:06:24
by dorminWS
Well, all this time has passed and nobody else has said it, so I will.

The most heinous thing about what was done to Phil Robertson and how it was done is that the GQ interviewer violated the sanctity of the blind. Words that pass between two men who are speaking frankly on serious matters in a duck/goose/deer blind always has been and of right ought to be protected by the same kind of inviolate confidentiality as what passes between lawyer and client or doctor and patient. Anybody who talks out of school about such stuff would be forever banished from the company and good offices of hunters and other men who matter. A New York Yankee GQ magazine hack is probably immune to such a terrible sanction. But he ort to have his ass kicked over it anyway.

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:40:44
by Reverenddel
I did not make that up. The council of Nicea removed it because it offended the Greeks.

Seriously.

They removed books, and rearranged certain books to meet their needs. Here's the list of what's removed/rearranged(Per Wikipedia, easier than me typing it out):

Apostolic Fathers-
Epistles of Clement · Epistles of Ignatius
Polycarp to the Philippians
Martyrdom of Polycarp · Didache
Barnabas · Diognetus
The Shepherd of Hermas

Jewish-Christian Gospels-
Ebionites · Hebrews · Nazarenes

Infancy Gospels-
James · Thomas · Syriac · Pseudo-Matthew · History of Joseph the Carpenter

Gnostic Gospels-
Judas · Mary · Phillip · Truth · Secret Mark · The Saviour

Other Gospels-
Thomas · Marcion · Peter · Barnabas

Apocalypse-
Paul · Coptic Paul
Peter · Gnostic Peter
Pseudo-Methodius · Thomas · Stephen
1 James · 2 James

Epistles-
Apocryphon of James
Epistula Apostolorum
Corinthians to Paul · Pseudo-Titus
Peter to Philip · Laodiceans
Seneca the Younger · 3 Corinthians

Acts-
Andrew · Barnabas · John · the Martyrs
Paul · Paul & Thecla
Peter · Peter & Andrew
Peter & Paul · Peter & the Twelve
Philip · Pilate · Thomas · Timothy
Xanthippe, Polyxena, & Rebecca

Misc-
Diatessaron
Questions of Bartholomew
Resurrection of Jesus Christ

"Lost" Books
Bartholomew · Cerinthus · Basilides · Mani ·

Historical Edits-
Decretum Gelasianum

So when people quote that "Thou shalt not add, nor take away from the scripture" I quiz them "Before, or after Nicea?" When you travel up, and down the spiritual/religious spectrum for years, and you decide Christianity... you better RESEARCH it before you start brow-beating folks.

It's why I keep my religious opinions generally too myself, and simply shake my head when I'm called an "idiot", or "Stupid" for having a belief in something much bigger, and better, than myself. I will defend my faith, but not with insults,

I quote Victor Hugo "Strong and bitter words indicate a weak cause".

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:45:00
by Kreutz
Of the texts listed above they were all removed due to their dubious sources and authorship. Quite a few of them were just retellings of pagan stories involving a Christian cast. It wasn't some DaVinci code conspiracy, just scholarship which is still in dispute today. I don't think the Catholic church nailed down their version (no pun intended) until the mid 16th century.

Surprised Maccabees 3 wasn't there; the Ethiopians use it and it's an interesting read.

The Book of Revelations barely made it in, which is funny since many fixate on that one most of all.

The Protestants further reduced the Bible in size by removing all OT books written by Greek speaking Jews (Baruch, Judith, etc.).

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:56:27
by Reverenddel
Never discount the source of God's word... otherwise, crazy men, shepherds, farmers, and prostitutes would never have validity.

They claimed "because not enough proof" existed, but they removed ALL the females who were strong, and fierce. Changed Mary Magdalene into a prostitute, and removed "Thomas" where Jesus said "The Church is built upon the word, not stone, nor timber, it is within each of us who worship the father through me."

IE: "YOU DON'T NEED A BUILDING TO GO TO CHURCH!"

Since I read that part? Never went back. Every church I've gone too has some preacher, rabbi, priest telling me what God says, I've always countered "God knows where I am... he speaks to me when he needs me... I don't need an interpreter."

Pisses'em off royally, but it's in the bible... people need to read that thing... ALL of it! Even the books they removed. It gives you more faith than you'd ever believe, more reason to love God, The Son, and the Holy Spirit than you'd ever need, and makes you realize, even with a hard-chargin', cursing, drinking idjut can do the will, and works of the LordThyGod.

Christmas pisses me off because to others it's about presents, and food, and tv specials, and lights, and blah, blah, blah....

The Roman's chose it to appease the pagans... People don't read everything, they just hear stuff, and take it as Gospel.

Maybe one day, I'll be here when Jesus comes back... and I will watch with joy, and happiness as he smites those who have done us wrong. "Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord." I cannot watch the fall-to-their knees unbelievers who shake, and quiver in his presence...

And I will utter the phrase people hear from me in conflict when I have surpassed them:

"WHAT NOW B*TCHES?!?!"

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 04:59:46
by 0ne5hot
Reverenddel wrote:Never discount the source of God's word... otherwise, crazy men, shepherds, farmers, and prostitutes would never have validity.

They claimed "because not enough proof" existed, but they removed ALL the females who were strong, and fierce. Changed Mary Magdalene into a prostitute, and removed "Thomas" where Jesus said "The Church is built upon the word, not stone, nor timber, it is within each of us who worship the father through me."

IE: "YOU DON'T NEED A BUILDING TO GO TO CHURCH!"

Since I read that part? Never went back. Every church I've gone too has some preacher, rabbi, priest telling me what God says, I've always countered "God knows where I am... he speaks to me when he needs me... I don't need an interpreter."

Pisses'em off royally, but it's in the bible... people need to read that thing... ALL of it! Even the books they removed. It gives you more faith than you'd ever believe, more reason to love God, The Son, and the Holy Spirit than you'd ever need, and makes you realize, even with a hard-chargin', cursing, drinking idjut can do the will, and works of the LordThyGod.

Christmas pisses me off because to others it's about presents, and food, and tv specials, and lights, and blah, blah, blah....

The Roman's chose it to appease the pagans... People don't read everything, they just hear stuff, and take it as Gospel.

Maybe one day, I'll be here when Jesus comes back... and I will watch with joy, and happiness as he smites those who have done us wrong. "Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord." I cannot watch the fall-to-their knees unbelievers who shake, and quiver in his presence...

And I will utter the phrase people hear from me in conflict when I have surpassed them:

"WHAT NOW B*TCHES?!?!"
:hysterical:

I also am very annoyed by people who misinterpret/mislead others about the scriptures.

Jesus was not a peace loving hippy like some people would want to believe. He was/is the textbook definition of a Radical Revolutionary.

IE: Hippies don't get crucified, they get marginalized.

Personal Property, Personal Responsibility and Capitalism are all Biblical Principals.

IE: In the parable about the talents the guy who is punished is the guy who did not attempt to use his talent but squandered the opportunity his master gave him. It also points to the fact that to whom much is given much is expected.

Also Jesus gets pissed at people who know the scriptures but did not follow them.

IE: When he saw the money changers and others doing buisness in the temple and he made a whip/switch, flipped tables (which is a badass move any day), and ran them out of the temple.

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:43:22
by vaeevictiss
I'm pretty sure Christmas wasn't to appease to the pagans. They slaughtered the pagans and took their holiday of Saturnalia and called it Christmas. Honestly, everything in Christianity came from some religion/faith/belief older than it.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:47:24
by Palladin
Well, yeah! What's older than God?! :dunno:

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 08:43:26
by Kreutz
vaeevictiss wrote:I'm pretty sure Christmas wasn't to appease to the pagans.
Indeed, Christianity was rather well established at that point.
They slaughtered the pagans
That didn't start until the Dark Ages-specifically Charlemagne. While violence between Christians and pagans (initiated by both sides-chiefly by vandalizing each others temples) in Rome was not new it was largely relegated to street brawl levels in size and scope.

In the early days of the Christian faith there was also quite a bit of intra-religious violence as well as doctrine was sorted out/dissidents punished.

and took their holiday of Saturnalia and called it Christmas.
"When was Jesus born" is still an unsettled question. In the end it was decided to do it on Saturnalia for the reason Saturnalia is around winter solstice (the darkest time of year representing the darkness pre-Christs birth).
Honestly, everything in Christianity came from some religion/faith/belief older than it.
You can't walk five steps into Judaism without tripping over Assyrian or Babylonian roots or in Islam without tripping over pagan semitic traditions either, what of it?

I agree superficially this is true, as there are similarities between Christianity and Mithraism (plus the Vatican is built on the foundations of a Mithraic temple ironically enough) and the cult of Deus Sol Invictus they break apart upon closer study.

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:54:14
by Reverenddel
A&E blinked... guess we figured out who won the pissin' contest!

Like I said! Never get into a pissin' contest with a man with NOTHING to lose, and NO PANTS ON!

A&E= wet feet.

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:57:51
by SHMIV
Yeah, no shock, there. Seems that folks who watch the show were annoyed and were vocal about it.

Wish they were that vocal around election time.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: Patriarch off 'Duck Dynasty' after gay comments

Posted: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:04:08
by OakRidgeStars
So I guess this means that the members of GLAAD will have to start watching the show so they can boycott it.