Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
OakRidgeStars
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 14108
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by OakRidgeStars »

Image
User avatar
tursiops
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:09:29

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by tursiops »

Mindflayer wrote:This ties EVERY mass shooting recently directly to a failure of the mental health system in the USA.
How does Ft Hood fit into this? Kind of a stretch, I would think.
OakRidgeStars
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 14108
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by OakRidgeStars »

The Fort Hood shooter was a devout Muslim who actually advertised his hatred of Americans. The only crazy people there were in the command that allowed him to operate as a shrink.
User avatar
GeneFrenkle
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:19:07

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by GeneFrenkle »

BBC is reporting there was a SWAT stand down order given during Monday's shooting.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/24153252

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
And if Bruce Dickinson wants more cowbell, we should probably give him more cowbell!
User avatar
2k05gt
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:04:58
Location: Northern VA

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by 2k05gt »

OK I heard today from a person that works at the Navy Yard that all weapons were ordered "Condition 3" Really,
Why would the Military order all guards to carry UNLOADED Firearms.. The Shooter killed a guard and took his AR 15, the shooter then noticed it was not loaded and dropped it. If the guard would have had a loaded weapon he could have stopped the shooter before more people were killed... WTF is this all about..
"A gun is like a parachute, if you ever need one and don't have one, you'll never need one again"
Calling Illegal Aliens “Undocumented residents” is like calling a Drug Dealers “Unlicensed Pharmacists!”
User avatar
Kreutz
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by Kreutz »

The conspiracy theories are already flying on this one, your source would fit into quite a few of them.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Mindflayer
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue, 18 May 2010 20:54:35

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by Mindflayer »

Six week cycles, right? #tinfoil

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
2k05gt
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:04:58
Location: Northern VA

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by 2k05gt »

Your right.. I questioned that as well,
The New York Times did print a correction to there multiple WRONG reporting

NYT Corrections:
Alexis bought a Remington 870 Express 12-gauge shotgun and about two boxes of ammunition, or about 24 shells. The purchases were approved after the store owner conducted the required federal background check,

The Virginia State Police said Tuesday that Mr. Alexis had passed all state and local background checks to buy the shotgun.

Despite statements on Monday from senior law enforcement officials — which were widely reported in the news media, including in The New York Times — that an AR-15 had been found at the scene, no such gun has been found. The authorities say they do not believe the gunman used one.

So how does this play into the Vice Presidents narrative to "Just buy a Shotgun and fire a couple of shots into the air"
"A gun is like a parachute, if you ever need one and don't have one, you'll never need one again"
Calling Illegal Aliens “Undocumented residents” is like calling a Drug Dealers “Unlicensed Pharmacists!”
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by MarcSpaz »

GeneFrenkle wrote:BBC is reporting there was a SWAT stand down order given during Monday's shooting.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/24153252

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Did these guys self-deploy to the scene? If so, that is a huge no-no in the emergency response world. The story seems like they showed up on their own and when they asked if they could engage, they where told to stand down.

Now, if someone in the local PD was asking for support from CERT and it was rejected by CERT GWO or watch captain (not sure of their titles), that would be pretty bad too.
2k05gt wrote:OK I heard today from a person that works at the Navy Yard that all weapons were ordered "Condition 3" Really,
Why would the Military order all guards to carry UNLOADED Firearms.. The Shooter killed a guard and took his AR 15, the shooter then noticed it was not loaded and dropped it. If the guard would have had a loaded weapon he could have stopped the shooter before more people were killed... WTF is this all about..
I have a family member who was an MP in the Army. He told me that when they were working sate-side they had 1 mag in the gun and 3 to 5 spare mags. The mags all had ammo but the weapon wasn't charged (one in the chamber.)

My wife worked on Quantico for years. One of her co-workers husband was an MP. He said the same thing.

I think your friend may have heard the same thing, but misunderstood. I think some people say the weapon is not loaded until there is a round in the chamber. There is a huge difference between Unloaded and no ammo.
User avatar
FiremanBob
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 2083
Joined: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:50:05

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by FiremanBob »

forgot to quote; see below.
Last edited by FiremanBob on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:48:10, edited 1 time in total.
Author of The 10/22 Companion: How to Operate, Troubleshoot, Maintain and Improve Your Ruger 10/22
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
User avatar
FiremanBob
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 2083
Joined: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:50:05

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by FiremanBob »

ratherfish wrote:The prior incident (police report to Navy) should have triggered suspension of his clearance and access and he should have been escorted out of the facility and credentials removed until an investigation was complete.

The officer at the Navy has blood on his hands if he didn't forward it to security.
But that would be racist...
Author of The 10/22 Companion: How to Operate, Troubleshoot, Maintain and Improve Your Ruger 10/22
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
User avatar
dorminWS
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7163
Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
Location: extreme SW VA

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by dorminWS »

More reports of bizarre behavior by Alexis.

http://gma.yahoo.com/navy-yard-shooter- ... ories.html
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by MarcSpaz »

I have a hard time believing that story. I am surprised they published it given the lack of ability to confirm validity.

Not saying it's not possible... just saying the family might be full of BS.
User avatar
tursiops
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:09:29

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by tursiops »

MarcSpaz wrote:I have a hard time believing that story. I am surprised they published it given the lack of ability to confirm validity.

Not saying it's not possible... just saying the family might be full of BS.
I find it completely believable. it is exactly the kind of thing that happens in airports all the time, without any shootings to follow. There are a lot of very weird people, and we get numb to their weird behavior. No one connected the dots on this guy, and it is no surprise. None of the dots were very big. My concern is the opposite: the feds (or somebody) actually starts looking at ALL the dots and trying to connect them. The NSA does that for a living, so it is not a fantasy. There will be a lot of false positives.....
User avatar
dorminWS
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7163
Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
Location: extreme SW VA

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by dorminWS »

tursiops wrote:
MarcSpaz wrote:I have a hard time believing that story. I am surprised they published it given the lack of ability to confirm validity.

Not saying it's not possible... just saying the family might be full of BS.
I find it completely believable. it is exactly the kind of thing that happens in airports all the time, without any shootings to follow. There are a lot of very weird people, and we get numb to their weird behavior. No one connected the dots on this guy, and it is no surprise. None of the dots were very big. My concern is the opposite: the feds (or somebody) actually starts looking at ALL the dots and trying to connect them. The NSA does that for a living, so it is not a fantasy. There will be a lot of false positives.....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I have had similar concerns since this has unfolded. I have been concerned that in the future really intrusive things will be done and those people who are the "watchers" will be inclined to label people as dangerous persons not worthy of any position of responsibility or trust or gun ownership based on some transient and relatively benign lapse of patience and decorum; using the experience with Aaron Alexis as justification. And of course, once that label has been attached, the burden would be upon the poor guy wearing the label to clear his name and justify his behavior. I think it is not only not a fantastic concern; I think it may be at least as likely as not.
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
User avatar
trailrunner
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:50:44
Location: Springfield VA

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by trailrunner »

dorminWS wrote:
I have had similar concerns since this has unfolded. I have been concerned that in the future really intrusive things will be done and those people who are the "watchers" will be inclined to label people as dangerous persons not worthy of any position of responsibility or trust or gun ownership based on some transient and relatively benign lapse of patience and decorum; using the experience with Aaron Alexis as justification. And of course, once that label has been attached, the burden would be upon the poor guy wearing the label to clear his name and justify his behavior. I think it is not only not a fantastic concern; I think it may be at least as likely as not.
I agree with this. At first the media made a lot out of the gun arrests that the shooter had. So he had two arrests. I'm not saying that he was an angel, but big deal -- those didn't indicate that he was going to be a mass murderer. Now they're focusing on how he got a security clearance. In my mind, that's missing the issue, which is that he was a mass murderer. So they're going to review the investigation and clearance procedures and blah blah blah. They're worried about how many government people conducted the background checks compared to how many contractors did the checks (as if that really makes a difference). How is that going to change anything for the better? They are just looking for a scapegoat, and since blaming the gun won't work this time, they have to find something else to blame. I just hope they don't over react and prevent someone who got in a schoolyard fight when they were 16 from getting a clearance or ever owning a gun.
User avatar
Kreutz
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by Kreutz »

:tinfoil: time.

The man had complained of "microwave brain control" (specifically commanding auditory hallucinations) and develops a pattern of blackouts curiously involving firearms that did not previously exist.

He took these concerns to the police himself which I find odd.

Then about a month and a half later he uses quite possibly the most mundane firearm in the country to waste a dozen lives on a military base.

An interesting Army report on microwaves specifically mentions "aural bioeffects" http://media.portland.indymedia.org/med ... 412898.pdf

The fact that microwaves have been studied and tested for communication and psychological warfare makes me wonder if we have a Manchurian candidate situation.

End :tinfoil:
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by MarcSpaz »

The effects of radio waves on the body and brain have been general knowledge for a century. I read articles from the early 1900's about an RF bath as treatment for some medical conditions. There is nothing new there.

If the guy did have something wrong with him due to RF exposure, it would likely be from that tard standing in front of a VLF parabolic to stay warm on cold nights.
User avatar
Glockem
Marksman
Marksman
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:46:28
Location: Manassas

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by Glockem »

This is maybe slightly off topic, but even the larger capacity 870 off the shelf holds 7+1 for a total of 8 rounds. Why with navy or military personnel likely surrounding this guy did someone not stop him while he reloaded the 870 ? Or did he start using that stolen pistol from the guard after firing all 8 shotgun rounds? It takes a long time and concentration to reload a shotgun, so I am surprised someone didn't take action if and when he was reloading.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Active shooter at Washington Navy Yard

Post by MarcSpaz »

I'll tell you why... because Dianne Feinstein and her little lib buddies' theory about banning high capacity magazines to save lives is a complete crock of poop!

More people died in this shooting than in the theater shooting in Aurora Co., and this guy didn't have an AR with a 100 round drum, a shotgun, a pistol, homemade tear gas and 1,000 rounds of ammo. It was one guy with 24 rounds and an old school style pump shotgun.

No one in there right mind is going to bum-rush a guy when they "think" he is reloading. In rare cases you will hear of care givers shielding children and family or loved ones trying to protect each other in the face of certain death. But that is extremely rare and those people typically die. Most people who are with strangers or acquaintances at work and are unarmed have the "flight" part of "fight or flight" kick in when it come to facing a gunman.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”