18.2-308.6 - Possession of unregistered firearm mufflers or silencers prohibited; penalty
Has the above referenced statute been repealed? When I go to that particular listing, it shows that it has.
Silencers legal?
Silencers legal?
Lord, please protect us today from having to use deadly force.
Re: Silencers legal?
Hmm...well, any legal silencer has to be registered under the Federal Class III rules, so having an unregistered one is verboten anyway.
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun"
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/ (podcast)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom ain't free, folks. It takes work.
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/ (podcast)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom ain't free, folks. It takes work.
- gunderwood
- VGOF Platinum Supporter

- Posts: 7189
- Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34
Re: Silencers legal?
The NFA requires all suppressors to be registered, so by definition all legal NFA suppressors are legal to own in VA.
According to this, that section was repealed. http://leg1.state.va.us/000/cod/18.2-308.6.HTM
According to this, that section was repealed. http://leg1.state.va.us/000/cod/18.2-308.6.HTM
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
Re: Silencers legal?
Plus they are legal to hunt with too. 
-
user
Re: Silencers legal?
The best way to look at the question in my opinion, based on current Virginia law, is that being in possession of a silencer is illegal in those situations in which being in possession of a firearm is illegal. So, don't have one if you're an illegal immigrant, been subjected to involuntary treatment for insanity, or a convicted felon, and don't carry one into the courthouse with you.
Re: Silencers legal?
Last time I searched the COV, the only reference I came up with regarding silencers was prohibiting them from courthouses. Other than that, Virginia does not recognize them as being anything, legally speaking.
The state police have directed that they not be recorded on the SP-65 and should not be called in to the background check office. (I think the latter is improper under certain circumstances, but that is neither here nor there.)
This is, of course, very different from everything else NFA, which the state treats as either firearms (AOWs, DDs), dangerous firearms (SBRs, SBSs), really really dangerous firearms (MGs), or OMGWTFBBQ!!1!one!! WE'S ALLS GONNA DIE!!1! (Streetsweepers, et al.).
The state police have directed that they not be recorded on the SP-65 and should not be called in to the background check office. (I think the latter is improper under certain circumstances, but that is neither here nor there.)
This is, of course, very different from everything else NFA, which the state treats as either firearms (AOWs, DDs), dangerous firearms (SBRs, SBSs), really really dangerous firearms (MGs), or OMGWTFBBQ!!1!one!! WE'S ALLS GONNA DIE!!1! (Streetsweepers, et al.).
Re: Silencers legal?
Diomed wrote: This is, of course, very different from everything else NFA, which the state treats as either firearms (AOWs, DDs), dangerous firearms (SBRs, SBSs), really really dangerous firearms (MGs), or OMGWTFBBQ!!1!one!! WE'S ALLS GONNA DIE!!1! (Streetsweepers, et al.).
OK, you got me laughing pretty well that time. Thanks!
("OMGWTFBBQ!!1!one!! WE'S ALLS GONNA DIE!!1!") still laughing
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun"
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/ (podcast)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom ain't free, folks. It takes work.
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/ (podcast)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom ain't free, folks. It takes work.

