Since Hillary Clinton says:
I guess we're going to (over)commit our troops to fighting the Korean War II?United States' "support for South Korea's defense is unequivocal"

I guess we're going to (over)commit our troops to fighting the Korean War II?United States' "support for South Korea's defense is unequivocal"





If we use my plan we'll need less than 100 good folks...I suspect they are ready to go this morning...OakRidgeStars wrote:How many teenage boys today even know what the Selective Service is?. God help us if they have to find out.
The only way we could go up against North Korea again, and maybe China too, would be to institute the draft.
We have some bad days ahead of us regardless.


It would take at least a year to re-energize the draft system. I know the local boards still exist, but it'd take time for them to get rolling. Then more time to induct and train. All the while you'd have active resistance to it, both publically and politically.OakRidgeStars wrote:How many teenage boys today even know what the Selective Service is?. God help us if they have to find out.
The only way we could go up against North Korea again, and maybe China too, would be to institute the draft.

Actually the shooting would most likely be over before everyone finished arguing over a draft...I'm not certain we would be smelling too rosy either.Diomed wrote: A war on the Korean peninsula would probably be over before the first batch of draftees was ready to stop a bullet. NK playing for keeps means chemical and probably nuclear weapons - ROK may not lose but they probably wouldn't win, either.

I wouldn't want to be living in Hawaii or Alaska. Or the west coast.zephyp wrote:I'm not certain we would be smelling too rosy either.

Well the good news is it looks like China might roll the bus over NK...if they side together and the SHTF then we toast here too...Diomed wrote:I wouldn't want to be living in Hawaii or Alaska. Or the west coast.zephyp wrote:I'm not certain we would be smelling too rosy either.
