sayonara charlie san

GS78 · Post by **GS78** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:18:52

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0322760120100303

Long overdue, another deomcrat thief getting 'GOT'. I actually heard some talking heads this morning saying Charlie rangel "deserves" a pass on his tax cheating because...........? because he has wanted this position on the ways and means committee his whole career, and to make him step down,because of these "allegations" is unfair. It has been reported that last week rangel offered to step down, but nancy pelosi reportedly refused his resignation. priceless. I see a campaign ad in there somewhere.

Post by **zephyp** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:34:48

Yes but I saw another article where this POD (d = dung) was quoted that he would most emphatically not step down or aside....

Post by **OakRidgeStars** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:03:50

Charlie Rangel is not going anywhere. He has enough juice in D.C. to do anything he wants.

He must have more insider info on the Washington elite than J. Edgar Hoover ever did.

GS78 · Post by **GS78** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:06:57

I betcha he goes away.....

a dollar.

BluemontGlock · Post by **BluemontGlock** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:08:14

can i get the name of his accountant

GS78 · Post by **GS78** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:26:31

BluemontGlock wrote:can i get the name of his accountant

sure, but first you have to have millions of dollars to hide...

Post by **zephyp** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:02:44

Well now. Fox News is reporting ole slick haired charlie boy is stepping down. Maybe its true...but he says it only temporary...do these dems have no sense of morals or ethics?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03 ... ics-probe/
--------------------------------
Embattled Rep. Charlie Rangel announced Wednesday that he plans to temporarily step down as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee amid a wide-ranging ethics probe.

Post by **OakRidgeStars** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:24:46

He'll be back

tem·po·rar·y [tem-puh-rer-ee]
–adjective
1.
lasting, existing, serving, or effective for a time only; not permanent: a temporary need; a temporary job.

VBshooter · Post by **VBshooter** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:27:23

Too bad we can't get Pelosi, Boxer,Waxman.Schumer and all other social pariahs to go the same route only on a much more permanent basis.Will be something to watch as this thing unfolds,while considering all the crooked stuff that has occured during this travesty called an administration to see how it comes out at the end.

GS78 · Post by **GS78** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:06:55

He won't be back, they never come back from this. This Temporary thing is just like popping smoke......it distracts people while you make your getaway.....trust me , I know a few things.....

Post by **zephyp** » Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:12:20

GS78 wrote:He won't be back, they never come back from this. This Temporary thing is just like popping smoke......it distracts people while you make your getaway.....trust me , I know a few things.....

Popped some smoke have we? And I think you're right...

Post by **OakRidgeStars** » Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:38:56

His replacement, either temporary or not, is just as bad as Rangel.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03 ... -chairman/

GS78 · Post by **GS78** » Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:10:38

OakRidgeStars wrote:His replacement, either temporary or not, is just as bad as Rangel.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03 ... -chairman/

Yeah, no doubt about that.

Post by **zephyp** » Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:32:17

GS78 wrote:
OakRidgeStars wrote:His replacement, either temporary or not, is just as bad as Rangel.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03 ... -chairman/
Yeah, no doubt about that.

I think they are still diddling over the second in command as a replacement. Last I read its not final yet until pelosi speaks...

GS78 · Post by **GS78** » Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:25:55

zephyp wrote:
GS78 wrote:
OakRidgeStars wrote:His replacement, either temporary or not, is just as bad as Rangel.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03 ... -chairman/
Yeah, no doubt about that.
I think they are still diddling over the second in command as a replacement. Last I read its not final yet until pelosi speaks...

I think the real reason they may be "diddling" as you put it , is because they are having trouble finding out whose skeletons have less meat still left on them.....

VBshooter · Post by **VBshooter** » Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:20:27

Pelosi is wetting herself now that she has 3 Califorons chairing the health care committees .Just about anybody would be an improvement over those three,

VBshooter · Post by **VBshooter** » Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:06:58

If you need a reason to dislike this guy watching this video will be all you need. This JA makes Boxer almost look humble.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjbPZAMked0

Post by **OakRidgeStars** » Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:55:35

Post by **zephyp** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:02:55

This is an excellent case in point for my post in the thread below.

http://vagunforum.net/politics/utah-dem ... t3971.html

These liberals are so full of themselves they will stop at nothing. This guy is typical of liberals projecting that only they know whats best. No one else understands anything. None of us on the right are smart or have a decent education.

VBshooter · Post by **VBshooter** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:01:05

The way he was acting made him a good candidate to have his eyes dotted from across the table. Then get serious.

Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

sayonara charlie san

sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san

Re: sayonara charlie san