US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Discussions concerning happenings in other states throughout this great land of ours.
Post Reply
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Post by AlanM »

S.42: How a Freedom Becomes a Felony
The U.S. Congress is now on the cusp of passing a horribly unconstitutional law. It is designated H.R. 8 in the House and S.42 in the Senate. These bills would criminalize the American tradition of private party sales, trades, and gifts of firearms. It would become a felony crime to transfer any post-1898 firearm without first visiting a Federal Firearms License (FFL) holder to fill out an ATF Form 4473, paying a transfer fee, and having that FFL phone the FBI to conduct a background check on the transferee. Without a “Yes you may” response from the ‘Mother May I?” Nanny State, it will be illegal to buy a gun, even from your next door neighbor.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
kelu
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1533
Joined: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:34:51

Re: US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Post by kelu »

It's time to make felons all those anti-american politicians.
All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party - Mao Tse Tung
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

Re: US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Post by AlanM »

The NRA has an email auto generator page: https://act.nraila.org/actions/campaigns/5518
Enter your info. add anything personal you wish to say and click send.
The email goes to your congressman.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
kelu
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1533
Joined: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:34:51

Re: US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Post by kelu »

Kaine already sent me a nice letter that he will vote for "commonsense" gun control.
When I hear this "common sense" or "sensible" I know already who I am talking to. Interesting is that nobody can clearly define what common sense or sensible is. Maybe because the real answer would be total disarmament, their wet dream to be able to impose their dictatorship.
Been there, seen that already.
See my signature.
All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party - Mao Tse Tung
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Post by MarcSpaz »

Politicians really don't represent the Republic anymore.
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Post by SHMIV »

If the opposite of "pro" is "con", what's the opposite of "progress"?

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: US Congress: S-42 Should we be worried?

Post by MarcSpaz »

:hysterical:
Post Reply

Return to “National Discussions”