Concerning the Democrat terrorist attack on Congressional Re

[mmckee1952]

Concerning the Democrat terrorist attack on Congressional Republicans
.
Concerning the Democrat terrorist attack on Congressional Republicans in Alexandria, Virginia, this morning. As is their method of operation to deny their involvement and paint the individual actor as an unhinged individual, Democrats, and the media, will attempt to paint the terrorist from Illinois (whom I will not name because he deserves no recognition for his crimes) as a man who was plagued by mental and emotional disorders, and was acting inconsistent with Democrat ideals or strategic policy.
.
That is a lie and will be a lie every time you hear it. The terrorist was acting exactly in concert with the demonstration of Democrat strategy from North to South and East to West. Do not repeat their claims that he was mentally deranged! He was a Democrat (of the Sanders camp) acting like all other Democrats in any of their quarters. He was a Democrat in every respect like Kathy Griffin or the actors in the New York play, "Julius Caesar" who laud and call for murder and mayhem, or the Hollywood elites or George Soros who promote and fund terrorist violence in the streets for Democrat political agendas. He may have been mentally deranged, but he was, indeed, mentally deranged in the exact same way that any and all Democrats are anywhere in the country. Indeed, he is just like the Islamic terrorist that the Democrats support in every respect until he accomplishes their terrorist act; then, to attempt to maintain some credibility, the Democrats--unlike the true Islamists--try to distance themselves from his or her acts. The Democrat terrorist was not deranged beyond what it necessarily means to be a Democrat--they are all deranged!
.
What you must remember is this. He obviously had contacts in the Democrat Party who assisted him in identifying when and where Republican legislators would be particularly vulnerable--in this case Gov. Terry McAuliffe's Virginia where only police and criminals carry guns. His agenda was carefully planned and executed to kill as many Republican legislators as possible to frustrate and obstruct the President's legislative agenda (absolute Democrat obstructionism like Democrat legislators and judges, but with guns). There was nothing random about his actions. This was a military style plan to fix and assault victims in a kill zone for a political purpose. He did not act alone and he most definitely was acting on behalf of George Soros' obstructionist agenda to overthrow Constitutional government. Never ever let the Democrats get away with denying their corporate involvement and participation in this attack on members of the Republican Party and the American People. This was and is an act of war by the Democrats on our way of life and government!
.
Do not be deceived by their denials or their feigned prayers. It is psychological operations only!
.
Stand strong, America, and refuse to allow the Democrats to overthrow our Constitutional government.
.
P.S. The only part of their operation that went wrong (for them) was that Majority Whip, Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Louisiana, was at the game practice this morning, which meant that a security detail of the Capitol Police was present to engage and kill the Democrat terrorist in his actions. Had it not been for the Capitol Police, no one would have had arms to protect themselves and the baseball diamond would have been a near perfect killing zone for the Democrat terrorist to slaughter his victims at will and without resistance.

[SHMIV]

This thing was appalling, of course. But, can we really be shocked by it? Really?

I may be appalled and disgusted, but I am most certainly not shocked, or even just the smallest bit surprised. The past several months have shown us these "anti-fa" groups who comfortably attack conservatives. They've used improvised weaponry, such as glass bottles or bricks, or they've used mace. It was just a matter of time, before some wingnut with a rifle showed up. How did nobody see the possibility of this?

(For any antigun lurkers, who may be observing, let me be clear: the wingnut is the problem, not his rifle. His rifle was merely a tool. An observant individual will note that the wingnut was stopped by men using similar tools. Attacks in Europe have recently demonstrated that those wishing to commit violent atrocities will use other tools, in the absence of firearms.)

Related: NBC displayed some ignorance (also not shocking; indeed, it's expected):

http://moonbattery.com/?p=85139

The dingbat has probably never even seen an actual firearm (outside of a holstered pistol, carried by a uniformed officer), yet she wants to educate us on the difference between a rifle and a pistol. If the context were different, this would almost be funny, bless her pea-pickin' little heart.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[CaptainMorgan]

I'm neither a cop or criminal and I carry in VA.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[AlanM]

I'm neither a cop or criminal and I carry in VA.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Me too.