I like Ted Cruz. I think that he has the best grasp of Constitutional law, theory, and application of all the current candidates, GOP or otherwise. He has also demonstrated the most backbone in upholding the Constitution. The problem is, I question his eligibility. I actually questioned it months ago, long before it was recently brought up; I had just forgotten it completely. If, indeed, Cruz is ineligible, I can no longer support him. Hypocritical implications aside, electing Cruz could set a very dangerous precedent that would be horribly abused in the future, regardless of how well Cruz would perform his Presidential duties.
Ann Coulter, who has an extreme bias towards Trump, makes a case against Cruz, here:
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2016-01-13.html
On the other hand, CNN contributer Akhil Reed Amar, who is supposed to be a Constitutional scholar, makes a case for Cruz. The problem is, in his case for Cruz, he exhibits a very poor understanding of what constitutes citizenship under the Constitution. His case is here:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/13/opinions/ ... index.html
In working this out in my head, I find that any argument that I apply to confirming that Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, could just as easily be applied to confirming that Cruz is Cuban. Or, one could make the case that he is Canadian by birth, too. (Although, the latter could prove more difficult, depending on Canadian law, of which I know nothing.)
This forum is made up of intelligent folks, so I would like to read y'all's thoughts on the subject.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]




