No proof of citizenship required as SCOTUS refuses to hear case.
"By not hearing the case, the Supreme Court effectively upheld the decision of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against Arizona and Kansas in November 2014, saying the EAC did not have to modify its form to meet state laws. Under the federal form, would-be voters need only swear under penalty of perjury that they are citizens." Now you know why Obama opened the borders to Mexicans and Moslems. 2016 - Might as well kiss it goodbye. The Dems will flood the polls with illegal aliens..
No proof of citizenship required as SCOTUS refuses to hear
-
mmckee1952
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 20:39:44
- Location: Cobbs Creek, VA
No proof of citizenship required as SCOTUS refuses to hear
“Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
― Benjamin Franklin
― Benjamin Franklin
-
MarcSpaz
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
- Location: Location: Location:
Re: No proof of citizenship required as SCOTUS refuses to hear
We're screwed.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
-
SHMIV
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 5741
- Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
- Location: Where ever I go, there I am.
Re: No proof of citizenship required as SCOTUS refuses to hear
We've been screwed for a while. Once we've all finished our glasses of roofied koolade, it should be more readily apparent.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon