The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
Post Reply
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by AlanM »

That's what you often hear from gun grabbers.
If that's the case, explain the below picture to me.
Note the date for when this weapon was in use.
I just happened to Google "matchlock". I knew that matchlock guns pre-dated flintlocks and wanted to see what one actually looked like.

Click here for the picture (it's too big)
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by MarcSpaz »

The 1500's are definitely before the constitution.

And don't forget fully automatic weapons like the Puckle Gun, made in 1718 (73 years before the Constitution) and the Belton Flintlock, made in 1777 (10 years before the Constitution).
User avatar
scott9050
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:59:36

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by scott9050 »

What about the repeating big caliber air rifle Lewis and Clark used in 1803?
Image
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by MarcSpaz »

It was a nice gun... but invented in 1795, after the constitution was written.

The idea is to emphasize semi-automatic and fully automatic weapons that existed before the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution. This is a means to debunk the argument "that the founders could have never imagined the power of modern weapons when they wrote the Constitution, so they must have meant flintlock muskets".
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by jdonovan »

the 1st doesn't apply to electrically powered communications. and the assembly clause only applies when you have walked, rode a horse, or a train to get to the point of assembly.

the 3rd only applies to homes heated by an open hearth wood fireplace

should I go on?
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by AlanM »

There were trains in the 1790s???
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by MarcSpaz »

George Carlin said it best when he wrote "You Don't Have Rights, You Have Privileges." He was a Conservative and a Christian... but made lots of jokes from the Liberal prospective to highlight just how retarded the Left is.

Very strong use of the F word and other curse words.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-pZUQv8mjQ
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by jdonovan »

AlanM wrote:There were trains in the 1790s???
yep, by about the mid 1750's.

Ok qualify the previous statement... trains traveling on wooden rails, with a length of track not exceeding 2 miles.
User avatar
widefat
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:11:49

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by widefat »

MarcSpaz wrote:It was a nice gun... but invented in 1795, after the constitution was written.

The idea is to emphasize semi-automatic and fully automatic weapons that existed before the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution. This is a means to debunk the argument "that the founders could have never imagined the power of modern weapons when they wrote the Constitution, so they must have meant flintlock muskets".
I have had success by asking the anti's if they really believed the Founding Fathers were so ignorant, uneducated, and shortsighted that they did not envision advancements in science, medicine, and yes....military arms.
Franklin and Jefferson were two of the smartest men to ever live, both with engineering/scientific minds. So, anti, do you really believe that the shortest, most concise amendment was written the way it was because the authors didnt think science would advance beyond 1787?
The United States of America:
Born: 4 July, 1776
Died: 6 November, 2012

I am a Native American. I was Born here.
User avatar
thekinetic
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1753
Joined: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:51:23
Location: Springfield, Va

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by thekinetic »

Well if that's what gun grabber mean than I be buying a cannon and a morter and see what they think of that when I fire it in the woods and they feel it 20 miles away in their home! :enlighten:
'Some may question your right to destroy ten billion people. Those who understand realise that you have no right to let them live!'
-In Exterminatus Extremis
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by jdonovan »

don't forget setting off fireworks on the 4th of July is illegal in VA... but firing your cannon is not.

Makes for some interesting discussions when the sheriffs office shows up. Even more fun when they explain to the neighbor that we were legal.
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by SHMIV »

Oooh. .. good to know. I'll have to acquire a cannon, or five.

If you live in Williamsburg or Yorktown, you could probably fire your cannon off in the back yard without the neighbors noticing; cannon fire is a daily occurrence, in the colonial area. So is musket fire. At least, it is during tourist season, anyway.

It's always funny when the new neighbor from some liberal mecca moves in during the quiet months... then tourist season kicks off with several bangs an hour. They freak out.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
grumpyMSG
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1049
Joined: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:24:42
Location: the Valley

Re: The writers of the constitution didn't mean repeating rifles

Post by grumpyMSG »

SHMIV wrote:It's always funny when the new neighbor from some liberal mecca moves in during the quiet months... then tourist season kicks off with several bangs an hour. They freak out.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Probably not as much fun as when someone from up north buys a "bargain" house in the winter next to a turkey farmer's fields...
Let's just say that it's months worth of entertainment.
You just have to ask yourself, is he telling you the truth based on knowledge and experience or spreading internet myths?
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”