
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/20 ... -purchases
And to perform all reimbursements in cash. And not deposit the same amount that the other party withdrew.dusterdude wrote:I guess we learned not to tell anyone that the purchaser was reimbursed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Swampman wrote:Wait, so if I buy a gun, it becomes a 10 year safe queen, then I sell it to someone else to make room in my safe, I'm a criminal? Now that's logic!
Not sure how you get that. The recipient of a gift is not a "purchaser". If the second transfer is performed within the laws of your state, I don't see how there could be an issue.jdonovan wrote:So my reading of this decision is it effectively prohibits purchasing firearms as gifts as well.
j1mmyd wrote:Not sure how you get that. The recipient of a gift is not a "purchaser". If the second transfer is performed within the laws of your state, I don't see how there could be an issue.jdonovan wrote:So my reading of this decision is it effectively prohibits purchasing firearms as gifts as well.
These guys were clearly trying to play games with a system known to be both capricious and unforgiving.