Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Handgun discussions - Handgun ammunition selection, gun modifications, pictures. Tell us about your handgun.
User avatar
TScottW99
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:07:51
Location: Roanoke

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by TScottW99 »

I have two pocket style weapons. A S&W 642 that I carry with a pocket holster and loaded with Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +P short barrel load. The other is a Ruger LC9 which I have a pocket holster for plus two IWB holsters. I carry it loaded with the Hornady Critical Duty 135 grain +P.

I have shot the Ruger LCP quite a bit before deciding to buy the LC9. Not much bigger but has much better sights and a bit more powerful round.
"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready."

-Theodore Roosevelt

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by gunderwood »

TScottW99 wrote:I have shot the Ruger LCP quite a bit before deciding to buy the LC9. Not much bigger but has much better sights and a bit more powerful round.
By the spec sheet it's not much bigger, but when I tried one in my jeans pocket it seemed like it was too big for that type of carry. Would make a great thin/small carry gun for other locations, but for an average pocket it seemed too big. However, I've only looked at an LC9...carried a LCP often. Your thoughts on actual pocket carry of an LC9?
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
scrubber3
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:51:32

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by scrubber3 »

The S&W bodyguard is a better quality pistol. ;)

I don't have either because I don't believe in .380 as a self defense round. (9mm minimum)

That being said, My job requires me to be around a lot of guns. I've spent a bunch of time with both and ive noticed that Ruger quality control is going down the drain. S&W is better by far.
I had a SCAR 17 and 16. I also had a bunch of Glocks and a couple H&K pistols. Oh and a DDM4, but I sold everything when our government told me these dangerous tools can actually hurt someone. Apparently they grow legs and go on killing sprees.
User avatar
TScottW99
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:07:51
Location: Roanoke

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by TScottW99 »

gunderwood wrote:
TScottW99 wrote:I have shot the Ruger LCP quite a bit before deciding to buy the LC9. Not much bigger but has much better sights and a bit more powerful round.
By the spec sheet it's not much bigger, but when I tried one in my jeans pocket it seemed like it was too big for that type of carry. Would make a great thin/small carry gun for other locations, but for an average pocket it seemed too big. However, I've only looked at an LC9...carried a LCP often. Your thoughts on actual pocket carry of an LC9?
I have been carrying the LC9 in a DeSantis Nemesis pocket holster. I don't wear jeans though. I usually wear Tru-Spec pants or shorts which have pretty large pockets.
"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready."

-Theodore Roosevelt

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by gunderwood »

TScottW99 wrote:
gunderwood wrote:
TScottW99 wrote:I have shot the Ruger LCP quite a bit before deciding to buy the LC9. Not much bigger but has much better sights and a bit more powerful round.
By the spec sheet it's not much bigger, but when I tried one in my jeans pocket it seemed like it was too big for that type of carry. Would make a great thin/small carry gun for other locations, but for an average pocket it seemed too big. However, I've only looked at an LC9...carried a LCP often. Your thoughts on actual pocket carry of an LC9?
I have been carrying the LC9 in a DeSantis Nemesis pocket holster. I don't wear jeans though. I usually wear Tru-Spec pants or shorts which have pretty large pockets.
Yes, I could see it working in "tactical" pants.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
ShortMan
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:16:19
Location: PW County

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by ShortMan »

I like my LCP because it has a smooth outside and operates well. No safety and a heavy trigger is my preferred style anyway. Its harder to shoot but that just forces you to train more, which is a good thing anyways.

For you folks complaining about it sticking or not operating reliably, try polishing the rails and/or using mili-tec all over the thing. It helped me.
User avatar
scrubber3
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:51:32

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by scrubber3 »

ShortMan wrote:I like my LCP because it has a smooth outside and operates well. No safety and a heavy trigger is my preferred style anyway. Its harder to shoot but that just forces you to train more, which is a good thing anyways.

For you folks complaining about it sticking or not operating reliably, try polishing the rails and/or using mili-tec all over the thing. It helped me.
IMHO, it should work flawless from the factory. It's advertised as a self defense/ CCP pistol. People should be able to trust their lives with it. Sorry, but I don't trust a pistol that needs work from the buyer to operate properly.
I had a SCAR 17 and 16. I also had a bunch of Glocks and a couple H&K pistols. Oh and a DDM4, but I sold everything when our government told me these dangerous tools can actually hurt someone. Apparently they grow legs and go on killing sprees.
User avatar
ShortMan
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:16:19
Location: PW County

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by ShortMan »

Actually, mine worked just fine out of the box. I have no idea why everyone else had problems.
User avatar
scrubber3
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:51:32

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by scrubber3 »

ShortMan wrote:I like my LCP because it has a smooth outside and operates well. No safety and a heavy trigger is my preferred style anyway. Its harder to shoot but that just forces you to train more, which is a good thing anyways.

For you folks complaining about it sticking or not operating reliably, try polishing the rails and/or using mili-tec all over the thing. It helped me.
Yours had no problems?

So that stuff you did helped you what exactly?

Not tying to be a butt, I'm just trying to understand.
I had a SCAR 17 and 16. I also had a bunch of Glocks and a couple H&K pistols. Oh and a DDM4, but I sold everything when our government told me these dangerous tools can actually hurt someone. Apparently they grow legs and go on killing sprees.
User avatar
ShortMan
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:16:19
Location: PW County

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by ShortMan »

It made it feel a little smoother but honestly it worked just fine before. Shot maybe 500 rounds through without mili-tec and never had any fails to feed or eject.
After militec shot approx 400 more rounds. Runs the same. Just feels smoother when I rack it with my hands.
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by gunderwood »

ShortMan wrote:Actually, mine worked just fine out of the box. I have no idea why everyone else had problems.
The handful I've seen all worked well out of the box, as does mine. Ruger has a good reputation for basic firearms that just work.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
speezack
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:13:34
Location: Kenbridge, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by speezack »

Just thought I would post a quick follow up on this thread.... after a year or so... I ended up buying a 'Bodyguard'.... then after several trips to the range... I gave my little LCP to my daughter. I keep the Bodyguard in the center console of my SUV... not a carry weapon but sort of a 'backup to the backup'... type thing... I also bought a Shield in .40 and put my LC9 in the safe... I like all 4 of the above guns but these Smiths are hard to beat... IMHO... of course guns are very much like women... It's all just a matter of opinion.... sort of like... "whatever flips your trigger"... and I have never tried to tell anyone what they should or should not carry... I am of the opinion that the only 'bad' choice in a concealed carry weapon, is the one you left at home. :doh:
Bill Marx, Sr.
"Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment."
"Will Rogers"
User avatar
Dooga
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:48:57
Location: Arlington, VA
Contact:

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by Dooga »

I replaced my LCP with a P32. I don't like the .380 snap. I wish Ruger made .32.
User avatar
mbireley
Sighting In
Sighting In
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:59:43

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by mbireley »

I love my LCP. Easy to carry, shoots nice, especially after the 13# recoil spring upgrade and Sweet Pea Trigger

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
mbireley
Sighting In
Sighting In
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:59:43

Re: Ruger LCP vs. SW Bodyguard (.380)

Post by mbireley »

I love my LCP. Easy to carry, shoots nice, especially after the 13# recoil spring upgrade and Sweet Pea Trigger

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Post Reply

Return to “Handguns/Pistols”