Whatever the deal, all our big three (GOA NRA AND VCDL) have come out for Cucc.
I am the first to wish the world would be voting solely in backlash to the attacks on 2A recently, but from my experience, the vast majority of the population believes they can only vote D or R if they want it to count. So, voting L does seem only to only have power in those who wish to make a stand.
Next, I'd point out that the governor only has power to veto. Constitutional carry could get past him without his consent.
Third, other than constitutional carry, it seems Cucc is fine.
Given this, it might be a better decision to join GOA na d NRA and support Cucc. Why dilute our own voting base under the aforementioned conditions?
With regard to evidence of backroom deals, i think there is enough: the decision to call and coach him was evidence enogh. Did they do the same for Mcawful and Sarvis? Simply put though, the decision for endorcement conflicts with the data obtained from the questionairre. At that point, I am sorry to say because I love VCDL, you need to come out and explain to your base the discrepancy. Most people understand reason, and i doubt many of us would go againt your endorsement choice if it were explained.
I am pretty sure we all understand why, but youve got to confirm it to show that you are working to help. Otherwise you become like the ohbummer administration.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
"The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution."
Thomas Jefferson
