[ Post made via Mobile Device ]










crystal ball question.AppealPlay wrote:Is there a timetable on when the new requirements take effect?

AppealPlay wrote:In case anyone's wondering, it looks like it's near impossible to get a signature in Henrico. It's such arbitrary nonsense. VCDL should push for a Tennessee style law where the General Assembly enjoins CLEOs to sign off provided the purchaser is eligible to own a firearm.
Here's the link for anyone who cares: https://immortalarms.com/NFAinfo.html

It just makes sense, from both the perspective of the purchaser of an NFA restricted item as well as the CLEO who signs the form. It would take away the CLEOs concern, right?NovaHunter wrote:AppealPlay wrote:In case anyone's wondering, it looks like it's near impossible to get a signature in Henrico. It's such arbitrary nonsense. VCDL should push for a Tennessee style law where the General Assembly enjoins CLEOs to sign off provided the purchaser is eligible to own a firearm.
Here's the link for anyone who cares: https://immortalarms.com/NFAinfo.html
I agree, we should ask our state legislators to enact such a law. I have talked to two of my legislators about it and have found that they are favorable to the idea. However, we will need VCDL or the NRA to back the law for it to actually get passed. (And, we would need a 2A friendly Gov. to sign it too)
If any of you are interested in pushing this proposal with your legislator or VCDL or NRA, then start pushing it NOW. State legislators are already starting to work on bills that they want to submit in front of the General Assembly in January.