http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12 ... 4_jifl.pdf
In short, drug dogs are illegal to use in a search of your house without first issuing a warrant. They consider it a 4A intrusion. Justice Satomayor gives a decent analogy of the thinking behind the ruling.
Florida VS Jardines - Supreme Court Ruling
- mamabearCali
- VGOF Bronze Supporter

- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:08:25
Re: Florida VS Jardines - Supreme Court Ruling
Good! Anything that strengthens the fourth amendment.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."
Re: Florida VS Jardines - Supreme Court Ruling
We still have a 4A?
When was this? I had assumed it murdered via sacrifice for the "war on drugs".
So can police chiefs still confiscate my car for their private use?
When was this? I had assumed it murdered via sacrifice for the "war on drugs".
So can police chiefs still confiscate my car for their private use?
- GeneFrenkle
- Sharp Shooter

- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:19:07
Re: Florida VS Jardines - Supreme Court Ruling
well, the irs can confiscate and sell your property on allegations of drug sales.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

And if Bruce Dickinson wants more cowbell, we should probably give him more cowbell!
