[ Post made via Mobile Device ]





Roverhound wrote:I would expect no less in DC. The stupidity trickles down from the White House, the Senate and Congress and spreads to the rest of the city.

One of them ; they: who are you talking about about here? please clarify
"Not to worry, I got this !!! " "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>dorminWS wrote:Where's ya'll's manners?
We should celebrate. How about us celeprating by open carrying and going to the range to shoot at some of those "hoodie" targets?
By the way, concerning Walter E.'s language in the linked article:
...............................................
"Each year, roughly 7,000 blacks are murdered. Ninety-four percent of the time, the murderer is another black person. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, between 1976 and 2011, there were 279,384 black murder victims. Using the 94 percent figure means that 262,621 were murdered by other blacks. Though blacks are 13 percent of the nation's population, they account for more than 50 percent of homicide victims. Nationally, black homicide victimization rate is six times that of whites, and in some cities, it's 22 times that of whites. Coupled with being most of the nation's homicide victims, blacks are most of the victims of violent personal crimes, such as assault and robbery",
...............................................
The gun grabbers always try to use gun violence and gun deaths to justify taking guns away from people. If you subscribe to that notion, the answer to the high death rate from gun violence among black people is simple and obvious:
Ban gun ownership for black people.
Wonder why Sarah Brady's outfit doesn't jump on that?
Of course, I don't advocate taking guns away from black people any more than I advocate taking my guns away from me. This was just a good way to demonstrate to folks how obnoxoius the idea of banning guns is if you happen to be one of the people with guns.
I see you have been taught well. Yes cast dispersion even in the face of blatant racism and don't forget to call it reverse racismVBshooter wrote:wda82 asked:One of them ; they: who are you talking about about here? please clarify
They ,them = Overly sensitive Blacks, Whites or any other entity that uses the race card for any reason or situation in an attempt to rationalize it and gain support or reward for the crap they support.. Happy now? Who let Gat6 back in ???

Racism is a survival strategy.Jamie wrote:Yelling "racist" is indeed a common tactic of the left. But that doesn't mean there is no more racism. As a couple of you in this thread have proven.
It's pretty disappointing to hear that from gentlemen with whom I agree 90% of the time.

Roverhound wrote:My only beef with "Trevon Martin Day" is the presumed guilt of Zimmerman and the presumed innocence of Martin. The facts aren't out yet. Let's hope both sides don't ignore them when they do come to light for the sake of justice.
If ignorance were a crime you sir would be on death rowKreutz wrote:Racism is a survival strategy.Jamie wrote:Yelling "racist" is indeed a common tactic of the left. But that doesn't mean there is no more racism. As a couple of you in this thread have proven.
It's pretty disappointing to hear that from gentlemen with whom I agree 90% of the time.
You can ask any one of the thousands of white women raped and/or murdered who went against that instinct and followed a black man somewhere or romantically got involved with one.
Now to play devils advocate I got a question for you? Is it not equally disturbing that some only concerned about the legal and political ramifications of this case's swoon to Zimmerman's defense aiding a potential killer?Roverhound wrote:My only beef with "Trevon Martin Day" is the presumed guilt of Zimmerman and the presumed innocence of Martin. The facts aren't out yet. Let's hope both sides don't ignore them when they do come to light for the sake of justice.



I would say donating to Zimmerman's legal defense fund or having a Zimmerman is innocent rally would be swooning to his defense. Simply stating that the man is innocent until presumed guilty on an Internet website is just that. After all, that's how the legal system works.wda82 wrote:Now to play devils advocate I got a question for you? Is it not equally disturbing that some only concerned about the legal and political ramifications of this case's swoon to Zimmerman's defense aiding a potential killer?Roverhound wrote:My only beef with "Trevon Martin Day" is the presumed guilt of Zimmerman and the presumed innocence of Martin. The facts aren't out yet. Let's hope both sides don't ignore them when they do come to light for the sake of justice.
Now this why the type of discourse I would love to engage in minus the hate speech. Personal I don't even think this case comes down to stand your ground. I've obviously wasn't there but bet this was a simple self-defense/murder case
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Indeed.wda82 wrote:If ignorance were a crime you sir would be on death row
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
GARLAND, Texas (AP) - A 76-year-old grandmother working at a suburban Dallas convenience store is in a hospital after a robber emptied her cash register, doused her with a flammable liquid and set her on fire.
Authorities haven't identified the woman but customers at the store in Garland tell Dallas TV station WFAA she lived nearby and had worked there more than a decade.
She was able to briefly describe her attacker Sunday morning and a 36-year-old man was arrested a short time later after trying to break into some homes.
Officers on patrol spotted the fire inside the store and pulled up just as the woman, engulfed in flames, staggered outside. Police put out the flames. She's been unable to speak with authorities because of her injuries.


Good for you. Once you figure out the difference between "data" and "anecdotes," get back to us.Kreutz wrote:I can post a few thousand more of these if you like.

Yes, it's very disturbing. Once again, we don't have the facts. We don't know what really took place that night. Only two people do, and one of them is, unfortunately, dead.wda82 wrote:Now to play devils advocate I got a question for you? Is it not equally disturbing that some only concerned about the legal and political ramifications of this case's swoon to Zimmerman's defense aiding a potential killer?Roverhound wrote:My only beef with "Trevon Martin Day" is the presumed guilt of Zimmerman and the presumed innocence of Martin. The facts aren't out yet. Let's hope both sides don't ignore them when they do come to light for the sake of justice.
Now this why the type of discourse I would love to engage in minus the hate speech. Personal I don't even think this case comes down to stand your ground. I've obviously wasn't there but bet this was a simple self-defense/murder case
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2