The Code of Virginia is not preemptible by local statute
by OakRidgeStars » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:14:07
From The Virginian-Pilot RICHMOND - Virginia's criminal background check system for firearm purchases, the first of its kind in the nation, is being targeted for elimination. Gun-rights advocates have lobbied Gov. Bob McDonnell to scrap the program, arguing that it is redundant because a federal background check system can replace it. Gun-control groups say doing so would take a valuable law enforcement tool away from Virginia State Police and undermine state gun laws. Efforts to cancel the state's 22-year-old background check system, known as the Virginia Firearms Transaction Program, could be debated in the upcoming General Assembly session. Republicans will control state government for the first time since 2001 and a determined push to loosen state gun laws is expected. Read entire article here: http://hamptonroads.com/2011/11/virgini ... challengedVote in the poll: http://hamptonroads.com/polls/should-vi ... ral-system
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” — Edmund Burke
-

OakRidgeStars
- VGOF Gold Supporter
-
- Posts: 7859
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
- Location: Virginia Beach
- First Name: Jay
- My Arsenal:
I have no idea what you're talking about
- Next Firearm:
Something scary...
-
by gunderwood » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:41:44
Good riddance.
sudo modprobe commonsense FATAL: Module commonsense not found. Folding@Home 
-

gunderwood
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
-
- Posts: 5648
- Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34
-
by Taggure » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:42:52
I think it should be the other way around Keep the Virginia Background check and do away with the Federal one. This is a Stae issue and the states should be the ones that do the check. I do agree that one of them should go and IMHO I think that the Federal should be the one to hit the door. Just my .02 worth Vern
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." Thomas Jefferson
-

Taggure
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:43:59
- First Name: Vern
- My Arsenal:
Mother: Ralphie, what would you like for Christmas?
Adult Ralphie: Horrified, I heard myself blurt it out.
Ralphie: I want an offical Red Rider carbine action two hundred shot range model air rifle.
-
by dorminWS » Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:31:27
Taggure wrote:I think it should be the other way around Keep the Virginia Background check and do away with the Federal one. This is a Stae issue and the states should be the ones that do the check. I do agree that one of them should go and IMHO I think that the Federal should be the one to hit the door. Just my .02 worth Vern
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Make that 4 cents.
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
-

dorminWS
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
-
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
- Location: extreme SW VA
- First Name: G2
- My Arsenal:
I don't think it's a good idea to put that online. WHO KNOWS who's checking? I love big-caliber and longe-range rifles and 1911 pistols, and I've got a few.
- Next Firearm:
I can always use another 1911.
-
by cwfunrider » Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:13:03
If it faster than sure. I ha e a common name so i always get delayed when having a check run. Usally only a couple of hours. But the last few times have been ridiculous. I went to the Dale City VFW show Saturday morning and put an application in around 11:00. Here it is Sunday night at 20:00 and still not even looked at yet. So much for the great "instant" background check. I think that if you have a valid CHP there should be a way to speed things up. Obviously i have passed it at least once to get my CHP. There should be some sort of link between me, my CHP, and my "record" that would negate my common name. Sorry, irritated rant. [ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
-

cwfunrider
- On Target
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:20:49
- First Name: Chris
- My Arsenal:
Taurus PT145 Taurus TCP 738 GLOCK 19 Charter Arms .38 Snubby Ruger 10-22 (the tack driver) Spikes Tactical AR in 5.56
-
by jdonovan » Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:18:22
I'd say they can keep what ever check system they want, but change the law in another way.
IMO if the dealer was willing to start the transaction by submitting the BC paperwork then they had an intent of completing the sale. Therefore, After 3 working days the dealer MUST complete the transfer.
Right now its an option for the dealer to complete the sale after an extended delay. But I know of NONE that will do so because of the liability it creates on them because the customer might be a prohibited person. For the dealers benefit, extend immunity from liability for improper transfer.
Its a shame that the automated systems can't use a unique ID number to AUTOMATICALLY disambiguate me from a same/similarly named person.
-

jdonovan
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02
-
by krmgator » Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:19:08
dorminWS wrote:Taggure wrote:I think it should be the other way around Keep the Virginia Background check and do away with the Federal one. This is a Stae issue and the states should be the ones that do the check. I do agree that one of them should go and IMHO I think that the Federal should be the one to hit the door. Just my .02 worth Vern
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Make that 4 cents.
And I'm going to double down on that. This is a states' rights issue. There will be lots of trouble with "federalized" gun laws and regulations; that includes a nationwide CCP.
-

krmgator
- On Target
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:12:38
-
-

VBshooter
- VGOF Silver Supporter
-
- Posts: 3264
- Joined: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:14:27
- Location: Virginia Beach
- First Name: Spence
- Next Firearm:
H&K Sig or an AK47/74
-
by KaosDad » Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:43:11
krmgator wrote:dorminWS wrote:Taggure wrote:I think it should be the other way around Keep the Virginia Background check and do away with the Federal one. This is a Stae issue and the states should be the ones that do the check. I do agree that one of them should go and IMHO I think that the Federal should be the one to hit the door. Just my .02 worth Vern
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Make that 4 cents.
And I'm going to double down on that. This is a states' rights issue. There will be lots of trouble with "federalized" gun laws and regulations; that includes a nationwide CCP.
QFE.
Proud Navy Dad
-

KaosDad
- VGOF Gold Supporter
-
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:56:03
- Location: Leesburg, VA
- First Name: Rich
- My Arsenal:
Sig P226R Stag Arms 2L Soviet Made SKS Ugartechia over/under 16ga Monkey Ward's side by side 16ga
- Next Firearm:
Wather P-1
-
by jdonovan » Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:28:30
peometer wrote:I heard that Virginia and Pennsylvania has no system of back ground check.Is it right?
you were told wrong.
-

jdonovan
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02
-
by gunderwood » Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:49:27
jdonovan wrote:peometer wrote:I heard that Virginia and Pennsylvania has no system of back ground check.Is it right?
you were told wrong.
+1 The whole point of this thread is that VA has a background check that is in addition to the Federal variant.
sudo modprobe commonsense FATAL: Module commonsense not found. Folding@Home 
-

gunderwood
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
-
- Posts: 5648
- Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34
-
Return to Virginia Laws and Regulations
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests 
|
|