Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

I've moved around alot, so I've read alot of local papers, and I can honestly say the RT is one of the better ones in terms of news and having a finger on the local pulse.

Needs to do more muckraking though...their HAS to be more corruption here, they're either not touching it or not trying to find it.

I consider Caseys continuing menstruation a small flaw in an otherwise decent paper.

Also cant say I see a liberal slant outside of Casey and the editor in chief....have you read the letters to the editor? They publish ALOT (as in its getting tiresome) of letters from hardcore Bible bangers.

Kreutz wrote:I've moved around alot, so I've read alot of local papers, and I can honestly say the RT is one of the better ones in terms of news and having a finger on the local pulse.

Needs to do more muckraking though...their HAS to be more corruption here, they're either not touching it or not trying to find it.

I consider Caseys continuing menstruation a small flaw in an otherwise decent paper.

Also cant say I see a liberal slant outside of Casey and the editor in chief....have you read the letters to the editor? They publish ALOT (as in its getting tiresome) of letters from hardcore Bible bangers.

Casey wrote about this, today, on his blog.
http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2011/ ... ut-not-me/

smltooner wrote:

Kreutz wrote:I've moved around alot, so I've read alot of local papers, and I can honestly say the RT is one of the better ones in terms of news and having a finger on the local pulse.

Needs to do more muckraking though...their HAS to be more corruption here, they're either not touching it or not trying to find it.

I consider Caseys continuing menstruation a small flaw in an otherwise decent paper.

Also cant say I see a liberal slant outside of Casey and the editor in chief....have you read the letters to the editor? They publish ALOT (as in its getting tiresome) of letters from hardcore Bible bangers.

Casey wrote about this, today, on his blog.
http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2011/ ... ut-not-me/

Heh, wouldn't have seen that otherwise (don't check their website or read blogs), so I figured I'd reply. Thanks for sharing it!

Kreutz wrote:I consider Caseys continuing ...

Could you be any more offensive?

Yarddawg wrote:

Kreutz wrote:I consider Caseys continuing ...

Could you be any more offensive?

Oh, God yes.

Did you know I am legally prohibited in the state of NY from telling my trademark dirty jokes within 500 feet of children, women, small winged insects, and religious ministers?

I'd share my version of The Aristocrats but I'd get banned for sure!