by dems4guns » Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:01:17
allingeneral wrote:Public schools don't have to "condone a religion" in order to allow prayer. I don't think anyone is saying that we want require class-wide participation in Christian prayer. It would be enough to allow someone to pray before they eat lunch or to speak to another student about God. without being reprimanded for "bringing religion into the school"
I think the right balance is to provide a minute of silence for those who choose to pray or simply meditate silently. And, the nonreligious should respect that. They are not being forced to hear any prayer. There are lots of good reasons for a moment of silence especially near holidays and in memoriam. It shows respect for those who server their country and respect for religious tolerance. Dems4guns
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity...
-

dems4guns
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:42:58
- Location: Vienna, VA
- First Name: Cody
- My Arsenal:
Ruger P95 9mm S&W Bodyguard 380 Remington 870 20 Gauge
- Next Firearm:
Beretta PX4 Compact
-
by dems4guns » Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:19:50
Yarddawg wrote:You implied that we cannot know what the founding father's intents were. I supplied the quotes from those same framers of the Constitution to show what their intents were. If you cannot accept that, don't make the implication!
NO. I said it doesn't matter what the founding fathers intents were. The US and State Constitutions and their associated laws are what we operate under, not the thoughts of people from 1780. What matters is what we want from our governments and from society today. What YOU and I think matters more than what Thomas Jefferson thought.....today. Can we use his wise words to develop our own positions?...Yes. Yarddawg wrote: A law abiding citizen should be able to obtain and possess in whatever manner they deem acceptable any firearm that they so choose without any governmental intrusion whatsoever! If that means that John Q. Public wants to have a fully automatic .50 caliber handgun and conceal it on his person while traveling freely from state to state in this once great nation, so be it! It's really nobody's business but his!
If my neighbor has a nuclear bomb, that is definitely my business and everyone else's business. So where do you draw the line? Machine guns? Hand grenades? C4 explosives? Surface to Air Missiles? Tanks? Howitzers? Chemical Weapons? Nuclear Weapons? Nuclear Tipped Missiles? Where? Yarddawg wrote:This would, of necessity, involve the revocation of the NFA and along with it the BATFE (not a bad thing IMO!).
Wouldn't be a bad idea to revise the NFA and the BATFE laws and agency mandates. Not sure I agree they should be eliminated entirely, but the laws should be liberalized and the systems modernized to prevent violent felons and mentally ill people from getting deadly weapons, especially ones that can cause a lot of death very quickly. I encourange you to check your facts rather than just swalloing the vast amount of political propaganda coming from the right wing and the Constitution Party. Positions coming from the Constitution party don't seem to stay very far from the official Fox News view of the world. Check your facts rather than just swallowing Fox News propaganda whole. Dems4Guns
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity...
-

dems4guns
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:42:58
- Location: Vienna, VA
- First Name: Cody
- My Arsenal:
Ruger P95 9mm S&W Bodyguard 380 Remington 870 20 Gauge
- Next Firearm:
Beretta PX4 Compact
-
by Yarddawg » Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:12:58
dems4guns wrote:Yarddawg wrote:You implied that we cannot know what the founding father's intents were. I supplied the quotes from those same framers of the Constitution to show what their intents were. If you cannot accept that, don't make the implication!
NO. I said it doesn't matter what the founding fathers intents were. The US and State Constitutions and their associated laws are what we operate under, not the thoughts of people from 1780. What matters is what we want from our governments and from society today. What YOU and I think matters more than what Thomas Jefferson thought.....today. Can we use his wise words to develop our own positions?...Yes.
I never said that you said that, I said that you implied it. dems4guns wrote:It doesn't matter what they said anyway. What matters is what we want our country to be TODAY.
Let's look at your argument here: Let's look at it from home. Let's assume you are married and have children, you tell your family "Don't swim in the lake." Your family doesn't like that and decide that to fit today's wants (it is 95 degrees today after all!), that they will swim there. You come home from a hard day at work and find them swimming in the lake. What do you do at that point? dems4guns wrote:Yarddawg wrote: A law abiding citizen should be able to obtain and possess in whatever manner they deem acceptable any firearm that they so choose without any governmental intrusion whatsoever! If that means that John Q. Public wants to have a fully automatic .50 caliber handgun and conceal it on his person while traveling freely from state to state in this once great nation, so be it! It's really nobody's business but his!
If my neighbor has a nuclear bomb, that is definitely my business and everyone else's business. So where do you draw the line? Machine guns? Hand grenades? C4 explosives? Surface to Air Missiles? Tanks? Howitzers? Chemical Weapons? Nuclear Weapons? Nuclear Tipped Missiles? Where?
What part of ANY firearms do you not understand? dems4guns wrote:Yarddawg wrote:This would, of necessity, involve the revocation of the NFA and along with it the BATFE (not a bad thing IMO!).
Wouldn't be a bad idea to revise the NFA and the BATFE laws and agency mandates. Not sure I agree they should be eliminated entirely, but the laws should be liberalized and the systems modernized to prevent violent felons and mentally ill people from getting deadly weapons, especially ones that can cause a lot of death very quickly.
Again, if they are a law abiding citizen, I have no problem with them owning these weapons. I encourange you to check your facts rather than just swalloing the vast amount of political propaganda coming from the right wing and the Constitution Party. Positions coming from the Constitution party don't seem to stay very far from the official Fox News view of the world. Check your facts rather than just swallowing Fox News propaganda whole. Dems4Guns[/quote] As I stated, I despise political partys, this party most closely matches my beliefs.
Engage your brain!
-

Yarddawg
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:14:28
- First Name: Yard
- My Arsenal:
Just enough to get in trouble with
-
-

allingeneral
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:25
- Location: King George, Virginia
- First Name: Rick
- My Arsenal:
Armalite M15A2 Ruger 10/22 S&W 4043 .40 Daly 1911 .45 Mossberg 500 12Ga Rem 870 Super Mag Ranger Youth 20Ga Browning Buck Mark .22 Chinese SKS (Circa mid-70's)
- Next Firearm:
Lever Action .357Mag
-
by Kreutz » Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:11:16
allingeneral wrote:Public schools don't have to "condone a religion" in order to allow prayer. I don't think anyone is saying that we want require class-wide participation in Christian prayer. It would be enough to allow someone to pray before they eat lunch or to speak to another student about God. without being reprimanded for "bringing religion into the school"
I agree a few moments to allow kids to engage in private prayer (or zone out) is fine as its simply an onus for an individual to engage in whatever they want for a minute or two. Posting the Ten Commandments on government property is a different (and to me pointless, I would think the Beatitudes are a better moral lesson anyway for people to live by) matter though. If prayer doesn't belong there, then how can you say that homosexuality does?
What do you mean by "belong there"? You make it sound like dudes were screwing in front of our class and we had to join in. We were simply taught the factual truths: 1) gay people exist(!) 2) They deserve equal treatment entitled to all human beings/American citizens(!) That seriously is the extent of the homosexual indoctrination in NY public schools. IIRC it covered about 10 minutes in class. Now maybe in San Francisco they have the live action demonstration.. This amounts to the school system condoning homosexual behavior, which is a very bad precedent to set IMHO.
No one chooses to be gay (who'd choose to be treated like a second class citizen?) so there is no danger of conversion. I am pulling my oldest daughter out of public school next year because they've gone crazy at the high school.
You certainly have the right to do so, hope she gets a quality education wherever she is. Normal kids aren't allowed to function anymore. All the whack-jobs make it impossible.
No such thing as normal man. I'm not sure why people have this idealized version of the past!
So rattle my bones all over the stones, I'm only a beggar-man whom nobody owns. Oh, see how words as old as sin, fit me like a glove.
I'm here and here I'll stay.
-

Kreutz
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42
- Location: Tea Party Mecca AKA Somalia
- First Name: Brian
- My Arsenal:
30.06 12ga. 9mm .45 7.62x38R 8x56r
- Next Firearm:
cz-82
-
by Kreutz » Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:23:57
dems4guns wrote:If my neighbor has a nuclear bomb, that is definitely my business and everyone else's business. So where do you draw the line? Machine guns? Hand grenades? C4 explosives? Surface to Air Missiles? Tanks? Howitzers? Chemical Weapons? Nuclear Weapons? Nuclear Tipped Missiles? Where?
Theres a patch of trees on my property I'd love to clear out...shelling them with a howitzer would probably be the easiest way to handle them. Just saying.
So rattle my bones all over the stones, I'm only a beggar-man whom nobody owns. Oh, see how words as old as sin, fit me like a glove.
I'm here and here I'll stay.
-

Kreutz
- Sharp Shooter
-
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42
- Location: Tea Party Mecca AKA Somalia
- First Name: Brian
- My Arsenal:
30.06 12ga. 9mm .45 7.62x38R 8x56r
- Next Firearm:
cz-82
-
-

zephyp
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
-
- Posts: 10207
- Joined: Tue, 05 May 2009 08:40:55
- Location: Springfield, VA
- First Name: DK
- My Arsenal:
My Favs: Whatever gets the job done.
- Next Firearm:
M-1 Garand
-
-

allingeneral
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 7428
- Joined: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:25
- Location: King George, Virginia
- First Name: Rick
- My Arsenal:
Armalite M15A2 Ruger 10/22 S&W 4043 .40 Daly 1911 .45 Mossberg 500 12Ga Rem 870 Super Mag Ranger Youth 20Ga Browning Buck Mark .22 Chinese SKS (Circa mid-70's)
- Next Firearm:
Lever Action .357Mag
-
Return to Politics (All other non-firearm related)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests 
|
|