Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

by **VBshooter** » Sat, 01 May 2010 09:48:30

Mayor Daly of Chicago apparently will go to any means to maintain his stranglehold on the city of Chicago regarding guns,,, National attempts did nothing so he is attempting to get sympathy from the World Court in Hague. Then you have the two "concerned" Chicago politicains who feel the National Guard should be used to control the crap hole known as Chicago. Let's hope the SCOTUS rules against Chicagos illegal ban and then the citizens get smart and run this useless corruption peddling POS out of office once and for all.

Mayor Daley Insults America In Pre-McDonald Ploy

Friday, April 30, 2010

Fearful that America’s Supreme Court will soon strike down Chicago’s handgun ban, frustrated by the Illinois legislature’s rejection of his anti-gun agenda, and repudiated by American courts and legislatures over his plan to sue federally licensed manufacturers and dealers of firearms for third-party crimes, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley (D) is showing contempt for his own country’s and state’s institutions, by seeking a foreign entity to enforce his anti-gun agenda against the American people.

This week, Daley called for “redress against the gun industry” in the World Court, in The Hague, Netherlands. Forgetting or not caring who his constituents are, Daley blurted “This is coming from international mayors. They’re saying, ‘We’re tired of your guns, America.’”

Daley’s global gun control fantasy received the endorsement of Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter (D), whose enthusiasm for international law is apparently matched by his novel interpretation of the United States Constitution. “I love the Second Amendment,” Nutter recently said, but “I have a First Amendment right not to be shot.” Nutter’s utterly ignorant statement proves that in our country, you can be elected to public office while knowing remarkably little about the Bill of Rights. Nutter acknowledged that the Daley’s scheme is a “long shot.” But, he said, “you never know until you try,” adding “The political establishment in many state capitals—and certainly in Washington [is] so deathly afraid of the NRA that people cannot make the right decision for their own constituents.”

And that’s not the only outrageous proposal put for forth by Chicago politicians of late. Illinois State Representatives John Fritchey (D) and LaShawn Ford (D) have decided that the best way to battle crime in “gun-free” Chicago is to militarize the city. The two legislators recently called on Illinois Governor Pat Quinn (D), Mayor Daley, and Chicago Police Superintendent Jody Weis to bring in the National Guard in an effort to thwart crime.

So in a city that is quickly starting to sound more like a banana republic, law-abiding citizens are denied the means to defend themselves, while the best suggestion anti-gun lawmakers can come up with to address crime is to emasculate the Chicago police department, and bring in soldiers to occupy the city and patrol the streets!

It’s a sad day in America when lawmakers would rather turn to National Guard patrols of city streets than to allow law-abiding citizens the choice to legally own and carry firearms for self-defense.

by **zephyp** » Sat, 01 May 2010 11:16:55

VBshooter wrote:And that’s not the only outrageous proposal put for forth by Chicago politicians of late. Illinois State Representatives John Fritchey (D) and LaShawn Ford (D) have decided that the best way to battle crime in “gun-free” Chicago is to militarize the city. The two legislators recently called on Illinois Governor Pat Quinn (D), Mayor Daley, and Chicago Police Superintendent Jody Weis to bring in the National Guard in an effort to thwart crime.

In case no one has been paying attention Chicago has been militarized on two fronts for years:

1 - a fascist government and at the state level too
2 - organized, motivated, and equipped soldiers grouped together in what we term "gangs"

I'm beginning to find it fascinating that we here at VGOF are seeing an influx of members from states such as NY, CA, MA, and NJ...why none from IL -- are they all brain dead... :whistle:

by **Vahunter** » Sat, 01 May 2010 12:53:33

Why none from IL. ? The citizens are banned from gun related sites by their leader. :whistle:

by **zephyp** » Sat, 01 May 2010 14:35:46

Vahunter wrote:Why none from IL. ? The citizens are banned from gun related sites by their leader.

Seems like they might too be banned from leaving the state...

by **MastaCAK47** » Sat, 01 May 2010 20:19:05

There's one thing I cannot stand and that's people thinking they have the right too sue manufactures for stupidity of a 'third party'. I use too do gun forms for a local business and believe it or not, there were wives/girlfriends who wanted too take their partner's place because they were incapable of reading. Personally, they shouldn't allow this. They are clearly incapable of reading a manual for proper use of a firearm. Also, please don't take the comment as I feel guns should be banned. The gun ban won't solve anything. Apart from sueing manufactures, that's like getting a Ford truck, having an accident with it from a mistake and blaming the company for lack of safety features. In crimes, however, it's different. I still don't think it's right too blame a company for the misuse. :packin: