I just feel like stirring the pot. (But probably won't get a good debate going here.)
Which side is the fringe?
The 4 to 5 million current NRA members or
The 50 thousand current and previous Brady campaign members?
|
| ||||||||||
|
Hey Firearm Owner - Join the discussion!
You are not registered yet? Please do so by clicking here: Register Already a member? Login here
Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) Needs Your Help - Click Here to Donate Now!
Click here for details -> why does VCDL need my help? Interesting question for debate
Forum rules
Gun related political postings are welcome here. If it's not firearm related, please don't post it.
5 posts • Page 1 of 1
Interesting question for debateI just feel like stirring the pot. (But probably won't get a good debate going here.)
Which side is the fringe? The 4 to 5 million current NRA members or The 50 thousand current and previous Brady campaign members? AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order. If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
Re: Interesting question for debateI'll take de bate....de fringe be whoever "they" make the most believe it is...and since "they" in this context be the Lame Stream Media we are the fringe...especially if you are God fearing, speak out against obummer, and are pro-life...the you be not only fringe but a threat...
No more catchy slogans for me...I am simply fed up...4...four...4...2+2...
![]()
Re: Interesting question for debateOne thing the MSM refuses to acknowledge is that many of us 2A supporters are not God-fearing and don't necessarily speak for or against Obama. And a lot of us yuppies with guns are really annoyed with how guns are portrayed by MSM... enough to sway voting decisions.
- Steve
Re: Interesting question for debateIt really bugs me when the MSM refers to the NRA as just another "Special interest group". In m opinion, the NRA isn't a special interest group since they have such a HUGE following. To me, a special interest group is the 40,000 people who fight for gay marriage all over the country or the 4,000 people involved in the "Save the whales from the Japanese whaling ships".
The NRA is representative of a large enough segment of the US population that it shouldn't be treated as a "fringe" or as a "Special interest". When the MSM speaks of the NRA guiding policy in our country, it should be taken seriously since our government is supposed to be doing as "We the people" want anyway. JMHO.
Re: Interesting question for debate
I have to agree with the spirit of this reply. The LSM (As DK called them) love to focus on the very ragged edge of any group - be they fringe or mainstream. However, they will ignore the everyday folks who just go about their business (like the fine folks here on this board) and quietly affirm their beliefs every day. While the NRA is a fine (although confused) organization, we need to support the more grass roots orgs like GOA & VCDL.
5 posts • Page 1 of 1
Return to Virginia and National Politics (Firearm Related Only) Who is online |
| ||||||||