It looks like VA gun dealers want to require mental health professionals to provide data about patients for background checks on gun purchases. According to one source, they see it as a way to protect themselves from lawsuits stemming from selling firearms to mentally unstable individuals.
While I understand their point, I think a better way to go would be to pass a bill that holds gun owners harmless for any firearm they lawfully sell.
Some may think this is reasonable, but I see it as a further corruption of the "innocent until proven guilty" principle. Where does it stop? As of right now, I do not believe someone being treated for say, depression, is ineligible for a concealed carry permit. Is it feasible that someone who is depressed could buy a gun and use it on him/her self or someone else? Sure it is. The same person could also buy a knife, a rope or a hammer and do the same. Where does it all stop?
It has to stop with the recognition of personal responsibility and a realization that society cannot legislate illegal or mentally unsound acts out of existence.
What we CAN and SHOULD do is put a stop to the idiocy of filing lawsuits on people just because they happen to have some sort of contact with someone bent on breaking the law. Gun shop owners are not, nor should be qualified to judge the intentions or mental capacity of their customers. Nor should they be held liable for their lawful and responsible actions.
As a society, we need to stop trying to slap the blame on anyone but the perpetrator of a crime.
Andy
























![Valid RSS feed [Valid RSS]](images/valid-rss.png)





