Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

by **kelu** » Tue, 15 May 2012 09:49:00

http://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news ... ero-2012-5
Skeet will be boring

by **Reverenddel** » Tue, 15 May 2012 10:07:38

TWO WORDS: 50 CAL!

AP is the only thing I think will penetrate that shell.

And the "goon squad" (as I have decided to call all LEO's who violate civil rights) will be at your front door in less than an hour.

by **kelu** » Tue, 15 May 2012 10:30:33

http://www.halfpasthuman.com/pterodactyl.html

by **Taggure** » Tue, 15 May 2012 10:44:58

kelu wrote:http://www.halfpasthuman.com/pterodactyl.html

by **Diomed** » Wed, 16 May 2012 00:38:32

Probably have more success kamikaze-ing a RC plane into it.

by **Jakeiscrazy** » Wed, 16 May 2012 21:08:43

Thousands of feet in the air? You guys have fun trying to shoot them down. I'll save my ammo for if it really gets serious.

by **BW1911** » Thu, 17 May 2012 05:49:10

Jakeiscrazy wrote:Thousands of feet in the air? You guys have fun trying to shoot them down. I'll save my ammo for if it really gets serious.

The little ones they'll have soon that hover outside your window and look in horizontally won't be thousands of feet up in the air... just sayin' :coffee:

by **kelu** » Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:26:07

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valle ... rveillance

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Tuesday introduced the Preserving Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act, which would require the government to get a warrant before using aerial drones to surveil U.S. citizens.

More broadly, Paul's bill is aimed at preventing "unwarranted governmental intrusion" through the use of drones, according to the lawmaker.

"Like other tools used to collect information in law enforcement, in order to use drones a warrant needs to be issued," Paul said Tuesday. "Americans going about their everyday lives should not be treated like criminals or terrorists and have their rights infringed upon by military tactics."

The bill, S. 3287, would require the government to obtain a warrant to use drones with the exception of patroling national borders, when drones are needed to prevent "imminent danger to life" or when there are risks of a terrorist attack.

The bill would also give Americans the ability to sue the government for violating the act. And, it would prohibit evidence collected with warrantless drone surveillance from being used as evidence in court.

by **CCFan** » Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:01:00

Maybe invent some new .50 cal smart bullets with mini-EMP loads... :whistle:

by **Diomed** » Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:55:23

kelu wrote:The bill, S. 3287, would require the government to obtain a warrant to use drones with the exception of patroling national borders, when drones are needed to prevent "imminent danger to life" or when there are risks of a terrorist attack.

So, basically this bill is toothless grandstanding. Got it.