I don't really understand why this editorial is titled the way it is since DC really hasn't done anything to change the de facto ban on firearms in the city. Seems to me like it's just a couple of baby steps to try to placate some folks and get the Washington Times off their back.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... s-gun-ban/























![Valid RSS feed [Valid RSS]](images/valid-rss.png)





